To read this content please select one of the options below:

HR practices and HRM outcomes: the role of basic need satisfaction

Elise Marescaux (Department of Business Studies, Lessius University College, Antwerp, Belgium, and Research Centre for Organisation Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)
Sophie De Winne (Department of Business Studies, Lessius University College, Antwerp, Belgium, and Research Centre for Organisation Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)
Luc Sels (Research Centre for Organisation Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 1 January 2013

15863

Abstract

Purpose

Based on soft HRM and self‐determination theory, the aim of this paper is to test whether basic need satisfaction mediates the relationship between five HR practices and HRM outcomes. An important distinction (in line with soft HRM and self‐determination theory) is made between the presence of, and the quality of, a practice's implementation (in terms of the degree to which employees' talents, interests and expectations are taken into account).

Design/methodology/approach

A theoretically grounded model is developed and tested using survey data from 5,748 Belgian employees.

Findings

The results indicate that autonomy and relatedness satisfaction partially mediate the relationship between HR practices and HRM outcomes. Taking into account talents, interests and expectations within HR practices is associated with higher basic need satisfaction and subsequently HRM outcomes in addition to the presence of practices.

Research limitations/implications

Future research could focus on HR practices and job design as both might affect basic need satisfaction and subsequently HRM outcomes. Additionally, behavior of the supervisor when administering HR practices can be further explored as a catalyst of basic need satisfaction.

Practical implications

HR actors should be aware that merely implementing soft HR practices may not suffice. They should also devote attention towards sufficiently taking into account individual talents, interests and expectations of employees when implementing them.

Originality/value

This paper contributes to the HRM literature by integrating soft HRM and self‐determination theory into one model. In doing so, it sheds light on the possible pathways through and conditions under which HR practices lead to favorable outcomes.

Keywords

Citation

Marescaux, E., De Winne, S. and Sels, L. (2013), "HR practices and HRM outcomes: the role of basic need satisfaction", Personnel Review, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481311285200

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles