To read this content please select one of the options below:

Quality behaviour for quality organizations

Valerie Sutherland (Manchester School of Management, UMIST.)
Peter Makin (Manchester School of Management, UMIST.)
Kevin Bright (Manchester School of Management, UMIST.)
Charles Cox (Manchester School of Management, UMIST.)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 1 September 1995

1939

Abstract

Goal setting and feedback techniques have previously been used to improve safety behaviour. Describes a pilot study of the application of a behaviour‐based quality improvement process in a continuous process production plant with a particular focus on certain aspects of the organizational structure and climate which might be conducive to the changes necessary to facilitate this approach. Since “quality improvement”, unlike “safety improvement”, is more likely to be contingent on interactions with other people, the need to optimize communication and interpersonal relationships at work are important. Suggests that an internal customer, linking‐pin model provides the optimal conditions required, and ensures a high level of employee participation in the process of continuous quality improvement.

Keywords

Citation

Sutherland, V., Makin, P., Bright, K. and Cox, C. (1995), "Quality behaviour for quality organizations", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739510092216

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles