To read this content please select one of the options below:

Decentralization and centralization: Governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe

Renate Minas (Institute for Future Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden)
Sharon Wright (School of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK)
Rik van Berkel (School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 15 June 2012

3919

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to examine the governance of activation in relation to the decentralization and centralization of activation for social assistance recipients in Sweden, The Netherlands and the UK.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper outlines broad trends in the governance of activation policies in Europe, focusing on processes of decentralization and centralization in Sweden (characterized by a context of shifting national and local level governance of policies, cultivated within a strong tradition of active labour market policies); The Netherlands (where there has been a deliberate shift in governance towards the local level); and the UK (typified by highly centralized decision making in policy design but local variation in delivery).

Findings

The comparison identified different paths of decentralization and examines how these processes interact and overlap with modes of centralization/coordination of policies. Finally, the paper demonstrates the interface between the modes of decentralization and centralization.

Originality/value

The investigation of vertical changes in the governance of activation in three country case studies provides an original in‐depth analysis of types and paths of decentralization and centralization.

Keywords

Citation

Minas, R., Wright, S. and van Berkel, R. (2012), "Decentralization and centralization: Governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 32 No. 5/6, pp. 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331211236989

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles