To read this content please select one of the options below:

Performance monitoring and quality outcomes in contracted services

Alison M. Dean (Department of Management, Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia)
Christopher Kiu (IBM Singapore Pte Ltd, Singapore)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 1 June 2002

4126

Abstract

The increased use of contracting for service delivery involves new challenges in ensuring that quality is maintained. Performance monitoring involves both efficiency (costs) and effectiveness (quality) measures; however, there is little guidance from the literature to indicate the best approaches in different contexts. This paper therefore reports on an exploratory study in which approaches to performance monitoring, and respondents’ views on best practice, were explored in contracted services. Key findings are that organisations rely on inspections by their own employees or contractor checklists, but that these practices are in conflict with their views on best practice. However, the respondents agreed that performance monitoring has a large effect on quality outcomes. Using both the literature and the study, a model has been developed that provides managers with a framework for improving their performance and quality monitoring practices, and highlights areas for future academic research.

Keywords

Citation

Dean, A.M. and Kiu, C. (2002), "Performance monitoring and quality outcomes in contracted services", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210421571

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles