To read this content please select one of the options below:

Objective versus projective measurement of need for achievement: the relation between TAT and CMPS

Ove C. Hansemark (Växjö University, School of Economics and Management, Bromölla, Sweden)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 1 June 1997

1835

Abstract

In entrepreneurship research, self‐reporting using questionnaires is often used as a replacement for the projective test, the thematic apperception test (TAT). Posits that this study is to examine whether an objective test, Cezarec‐Marks personal scheme (CMPS) can be used as a replacement measure for TAT. States that the subjects in the investigation are people in higher education; two measures of the same individuals, over a period of seven months, were carried out, the average age at the first test was 21.3 years, and an analysis of correlation shows no correlation (r(t1) = 0.0556, n = 89, r(t)2 = 0.0733, n = 71) between need for achievement with TAT and need for achievement with CMPS. Confirms the findings of the study that the hypothesis of TAT cannot be replaced by CMPS.

Keywords

Citation

Hansemark, O.C. (1997), "Objective versus projective measurement of need for achievement: the relation between TAT and CMPS", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683949710174874

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles