An institutional perspective of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act

Abstract

Purpose

In the light of recent financial scandals, such as Enron, Global Crossing and WorldCom, the purpose of this paper is to use an institutional theory perspective to examine the interactions between the accounting profession, the SEC and the Congress.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper takes an institutional perspective of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act and reviews how historical events have led to various institutional developments, which, in turn, have resulted in accountancy changes.

Findings

The end result is posited to be an outcome that enhances the legitimacy of the SEC to regulate the accounting profession. At the same time, the accounting profession will emerge from the events able to proclaim that it is improved. Finally, politicians will garner favor from the voters since they have acted to protect the public from financial frauds.

Originality/value

Describes how the relationship among the three parties is in reality a highly predictable set of behaviors that will allow all of the participants to demonstrate legitimacy to their external constituents and enable each party to secure enhanced future resources.

Citation

Baker, R.L., Bealing, W.E., Nelson, D.A. and Blair Staley, A. (2006), "An institutional perspective of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610634739