Why the best and brightest approaches don't solve the innovation dilemma

Abstract

Purpose

Highlight the management dilemma disruptive innovation poses and examine what the leading management theorists have to offer as a solution.

Design/methodology/approach

The author examines six leading theories of innovation and three alternatives to disruptive innovation.

Findings

The leading theories that try to solve the paradox of innovation don't work and the alternatives to disruptive innovation merely delay having to deal with the dilemma.

Research limitations/implications

The author reviewed many theoretical approaches to innovation management and selected six for commentary.

Practical implications

The author argues that the theorists are looking at innovation in the wrong way. Because innovation is a paradox, the solution lies in rethinking the fundamental assumptions.

Originality/value

First article that examines the logic behind the leading disruptive innovation theories and refutes their advice.

Citation

Denning, S. (2005), "Why the best and brightest approaches don't solve the innovation dilemma", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570510699932