Alternatives to antagonism: a legal and a lay perspective on safeguarding for vulnerable adults

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to explore the potential impact on families of a greater emphasis on safeguarding for vulnerable adults, from both a legal and a lay perspective.

Design/methodology/approach

Case examples are used to illustrate some of the issues and problems that can arise in safeguarding situations.

Findings

In community settings there can be a tendency for Social Services to take an antagonistic rather than a conciliatory approach when communicating with families. In the setting of a care home, an example of the appropriate use of safeguarding is outlined.

Practical implications

The authors argue that Social Services should take a more conciliatory approach and be prepared to work in partnership with families.

Originality/value

The discursive format and narrative approach of this paper represents a useful and informative way of presenting important and topical insights.

Citation

Searle, C. and Basset, T. (2012), "Alternatives to antagonism: a legal and a lay perspective on safeguarding for vulnerable adults", The Journal of Adult Protection, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/14668201211280206