To read this content please select one of the options below:

Could refurbishment of “traditional” buildings reduce carbon emissions?

Richard Atkins (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK)
Rohinton Emmanuel (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK)

Built Environment Project and Asset Management

ISSN: 2044-124X

Article publication date: 7 July 2014

625

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluate the post occupancy performance of a typical “traditional” building using multiple post occupancy evaluation (PoE) protocols against design intents to learn lessons about their suitability in meeting UK's climate change reduction targets. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

PoE studies of a single case study, Norton Park, using three PoE methodologies. Gaps and overlaps between the PoE protocols are assessed and their role in improving energy and carbon emission performance of traditional buildings is explored.

Findings

Refurbishment of the type undertaken in this case study could halve the energy use in traditional buildings with comparable savings in CO2 emission.

Research limitations/implications

Traditional buildings could positively contribute to achieving climate change reduction targets; regular feedback loops improve performance over time.

Practical implications

Quantification of the likely national benefit of focusing retrofit actions on traditional buildings is explored.

Originality/value

The research study demonstrates that very high levels of energy saving can be achieved when traditional buildings are refurbished. In addition on-going monitoring and PoE studies highlight opportunities to optimise the performance of traditional buildings.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Usable Buildings Trust for the use of the BUS Methodology and to DQM Solutions Limited for the use of the Design Quality Method in this research.

Citation

Atkins, R. and Emmanuel, R. (2014), "Could refurbishment of “traditional” buildings reduce carbon emissions?", Built Environment Project and Asset Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2013-0030

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles