To read this content please select one of the options below:

Attached to or stuck in? How resource attributes of i-deals influence the variation in continuance or affective commitment

Yan Liu (School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)
Miaodi Zhou (School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)
Lingyan Hu (School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)
Kimberly S. Jaussi (School of Management and Centre for Leadership Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA)

Baltic Journal of Management

ISSN: 1746-5265

Article publication date: 5 September 2023

Issue publication date: 15 November 2023

143

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to identify when and why receiving i-deals will result in an increase in affective commitment rather than continuance commitment. As affective commitment yields long-term benefits for organizations than continuance commitment, this work will help organizations accrue maximum benefits from granting i-deals.

Design/methodology/approach

This study develops a cognitive model delineating the process between i-deal receipt and the variation in i-dealers’ continuance or affective commitment.

Findings

After receiving i-deals, i-dealers’ perceived valence may change with i-dealers’ evaluations of i-deal resources under the condition of coworkers' negative reactions or organizational investment. The i-deal valence changes trigger i-dealers’ internal or external attributions of coworkers' negative reactions or organizational investment, which leads to the variation in continuance or affective commitment. The changes of affective commitment also affect the variation in continuance commitment.

Originality/value

Integrating expectancy theory and attribution theory, this research addresses inconsistent findings about i-deals’ effect on continuance or affective commitment by revealing the critical factors that lead to the variation in the two types of commitment. The proposed model offers new theoretical rationale for why i-dealers may not reciprocate the goodwill of i-deals to their organizations. This study suggests i-dealers will engage in attributions rather than being passive recipients of their coworkers' negative reactions, which challenges previous view that the effectiveness of i-deals is ultimately determined by coworkers' acceptance. This research also extends the i-deal dynamics literature by depicting how i-deal valence changes arise and influence continuance or affective commitment.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 71872135).

Citation

Liu, Y., Zhou, M., Hu, L. and Jaussi, K.S. (2023), "Attached to or stuck in? How resource attributes of i-deals influence the variation in continuance or affective commitment", Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 579-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-10-2022-0394

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles