To read this content please select one of the options below:

Cultural dimensions as correlates of favoritism and the mediating role of trust

Hohjin Im (Department of Psychological Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA)
Chuansheng Chen (Department of Psychological Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA)

Cross Cultural & Strategic Management

ISSN: 2059-5794

Article publication date: 11 May 2020

Issue publication date: 3 September 2020

806

Abstract

Purpose

This study sought to examine the relation of cultural practices and values with favoritism and nepotism/cronyism. Additionally, this study's purpose was also to examine how trust mediates the relation between culture and favoritism.

Design/methodology/approach

Correlations were used for exploratory investigation into the bivariate relations between culture and favoritism and nepotism/cronyism across 97 cultures. Hierarchical linear regression analyses were then conducted to examine the cultural correlates of favoritism and nepotism/cronyism holding all other variables constant. Lastly, partial least squares structural equation modeling was used to examine the mediating role of societal levels of trust.

Findings

Bivariate correlations showed that collectivism, familism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance are positive correlates of both favoritism and nepotism/cronyism. Institutional collectivism, future orientation and trust, on the other hand, were negative correlates of favoritism and nepotism/cronyism. Uncertainty avoidance and trust were key correlates of favoritism while familism and future orientation were key correlates of nepotism/cronyism. Trust fully mediated the relation between culture and favoritism but did not mediate the relation between culture and nepotism/cronyism.

Originality/value

This study adds to the current body of literature on culture and favoritism. Notably, the findings regarding different key cultural correlates with respect to favoritism and nepotism/cronyism provide valuable implications for expanding our understanding of the psychological and social nuances of favoritism. Specifically, favoritism in transactions and interactions with those not bound by social commitment relationships may be explained by beliefs while interactions with those with social relationships (e.g., family and friends) may be explained by preferences.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Ellen Greenberger for her comments made on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Conflict of Interest: Both authors, Hohjin Im and Chuansheng Chen, declare no conflicts of interest.

Citation

Im, H. and Chen, C. (2020), "Cultural dimensions as correlates of favoritism and the mediating role of trust", Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 417-445. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2019-0165

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles