To read this content please select one of the options below:

Addressing COVID through PCD: policy coherence for vulnerability in development and its relationship to the coronavirus pandemic

Sergio Moldes-Anaya (Departamento de Sociología e Instituto de la Paz y los Conflictos, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain)
Harlan Koff (Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur Alzette, Luxembourg) (Instituto de Ecología, A.C. (INECOL), Xalapa, Mexico) (Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, South Africa)
Angelica Da Porto (Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur Alzette, Luxembourg)
Tara Lipovina (Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur Alzette, Luxembourg)

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

ISSN: 2040-7149

Article publication date: 1 February 2021

Issue publication date: 7 February 2022

388

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to understand how coronavirus impacts relate to existing vulnerabilities in different world regions.

Design/methodology/approach

The article utilizes quantitative analysis to examine regional variations in coronavirus risk assessment. It then qualitatively employs a policy coherence for development (PCD) approach to analyze how public policies contribute to or mitigate vulnerability, defined as the product of exposure to external shocks, institutional coping capabilities and risk associated with social divisions in societies.

Findings

The research presented below shows that significant regional variance exists in terms of coronavirus risk, based on statistical analysis of the INFORM COVID-19 Risk Report prepared by the European Commission. The PCD analysis highlights important relationships between public policy strategies and the construction of both underlying vulnerabilities and coronavirus impacts.

Practical implications

The PCD approach presented here focuses on the reconciliation of trade-offs. It shows how policy interactions affect vulnerabilities and suggests that coherent policy strategies aimed at reducing vulnerabilities are necessary in order to adequately respond to the coronavirus pandemic.

Originality/value

This analysis frames vulnerability as a socially constructed condition and through implementation of a PCD approach, it indicates how policy strategies contribute to or mitigate vulnerabilities. In doing so, it intends to contribute conceptually to the literature on vulnerability by showing how policy incoherences contribute to the construction of this condition. Empirically, the originality of this article is its statistical analysis of regional variance of coronavirus risk and the qualitative analysis of policy strategies in representative cases and how they have affected vulnerabilities and coronavirus impacts.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This article derives from research conducted through the GAMMA-UL Chair in Regional Integration and Sustainability, INECOL. It was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Mexico, grant number 296842 “Uso de big data para la gestión ambiental del desarrollo sostenible (Integralidad Gamma)”.

Citation

Moldes-Anaya, S., Koff, H., Da Porto, A. and Lipovina, T. (2022), "Addressing COVID through PCD: policy coherence for vulnerability in development and its relationship to the coronavirus pandemic", Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 129-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2020-0253

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles