The relationship between attitudes in Poland towards the decommodified welfare state with those on the communist economy and transition to a market economy

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is threefold: to examine social opinions in Poland towards the decommodified ideal type of welfare state, as developed by Esping-Andersen; to look at the extent to which this is correlated with opinions towards aspects of the Communist economy and the transition from this system; and to show how opinions on decommodification and the Communist economy and transition are multi-faceted and reflect differing socio-economic interests.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper draws on data obtained from a questionnaire asked to a random sample of 1,001 respondents in Poland. A factor analysis of questions related to the topic is carried out and then bivariate correlation and multivariate regression analyses are performed to test the relationship between attitudes towards decommodification and the (post) Communist economy.

Findings

It is discovered that the opinions of Polish society are close to many aspects of the decommodified welfare model, although these are not homogenous. There is a significant correlation between opinions towards the Communist economy and transition with the decommodified welfare state, although this weakens when the respondents are asked about more specific issues of welfare that most directly relate to their everyday lives.

Originality/value

The paper uses high quality data from an original data source, to both examine opinions on the welfare system and the Communist economy and transition. This allows us to better understand opinions towards the welfare state in Poland and understand how the historical legacy of Communism influences these opinions.

Citation

John Rae, G. (2017), "The relationship between attitudes in Poland towards the decommodified welfare state with those on the communist economy and transition to a market economy", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 44 No. 12, pp. 2128-2140. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2016-0057