Internet users beware, you follow online health rumors (more than counter-rumors) irrespective of risk propensity and prior endorsement

Abstract

Purpose

The Internet is a breeding ground for rumors. A way to tackle the problem involves the use of counter-rumor messages that refute rumors. This paper analyzes users' intention to follow rumors and counter-rumors as a function of two factors: individuals' risk propensity and messages' prior endorsement.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper conducted an online experiment. Complete responses from 134 participants were analyzed statistically.

Findings

Risk-seeking users were keener to follow counter-rumors compared with risk-averse ones. No difference was detected in terms of their intention to follow rumors. Users' intention to follow rumors always exceeded their intention to follow counter-rumors regardless of whether prior endorsement was low or high.

Research limitations/implications

This paper contributes to the scholarly understanding of people's behavioral responses when, unknowingly, exposed to rumors and counter-rumors on the Internet. Moreover, it dovetails the literature by examining how risk-averse and risk-seeking individuals differ in terms of intention to follow rumors and counter-rumors. It also shows how prior endorsement of such messages drives their likelihood to be followed.

Originality/value

The paper explores the hitherto elusive question: When users are unknowingly exposed to both a rumor and its counter-rumor, which entry is likely to be followed more than the other? It also takes into consideration the roles played by individuals' risk propensity and messages' prior endorsement.

Citation

Pal, A. and Banerjee, S. (2021), "Internet users beware, you follow online health rumors (more than counter-rumors) irrespective of risk propensity and prior endorsement", Information Technology & People, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 1721-1739. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2019-0097