Environmental reporting practices and performance of timber firms in Ghana: Perceptions of practitioners

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to assess the motivations of timber firms in Ghana to undertake environmental accounting and reporting (EAR) and the perceived benefits from it.

Design/methodology/approach

Survey method involving primary data from a census of 13 timber firms in Kumasi (Ghana) and descriptive statistics including Kendall’s coefficient were used to analyze the perceptions of practitioners on EAR.

Findings

The study offered support for the political economy, legitimacy and stakeholder theories generally applied to the study of EAR. Specifically, the study concluded that EAR is common to timber firms in Ghana. Pressure from government, media, shareholders’ influence and the existence of environmental committee or department in the company are perceived to influence timber firms’ level of environmental disclosure. Meanwhile, perceived benefits from EAR include fostering cordial relationship between timber firms and the society, preventing government fines and improving firm reputation.

Research limitations/implications

The presence of biases in the responses of survey method studies can be difficult to eliminate. However, given the benefits associated with getting practitioners views on EAR and the reliability/validity procedures that the instruments and respondents were subjected to, this weakness was reduced to its barest minimum.

Practical implications

The study recommends that governments should adopt green tax policy to encourage EAR while regulatory bodies make EAR mandatory.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the discussion on EAR from the perspective of practitioners in the timber industry of Ghana, which has been neglected in previous studies.

Citation

Agyei, S.K. and Yankey, B. (2019), "Environmental reporting practices and performance of timber firms in Ghana: Perceptions of practitioners", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 268-286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2017-0127