To read this content please select one of the options below:

Subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism: a scale development

María Fernanda Wagstaff (Department of Marketing and Management, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA)
Adrienne Collela (A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA)
María del Carmen Triana (Management and Human Resources Department, The University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA)
Alexis Nicole Smith (Spears School of Business, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA)
Marla Baskerville Watkins (College of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 10 August 2015

810

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing from social dominance theories and conceptualizations of paternalism, the purpose of this paper is to define and develop a measure of subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism (SPSP).

Design/methodology/approach

The authors assess the validity of the measure using Hinkin’s (1998) scale development steps.

Findings

The authors found evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the measure of subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism drawing from three different samples. Participants in the study were also able to differentiate a low from a high paternalism condition using the measure of paternalism. Finally, as expected, the interaction between a supervisor’s benevolence and control was significantly associated with subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism.

Research limitations/implications

The authors provide evidence for the validity of a measure of subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism while controlling for various status signals represented by demographic variables. Results may have been influenced by common method variance. However, there is no theoretical reason to expect any such interactions. Additionally, as the authors limited the data collection to the USA, the authors caution against generalizing beyond that context.

Practical implications

The authors provide validity and reliability evidence for a unidimensional measure that is short and easy to administer in future research to further examine the consequences of perceptions of supervisor paternalism.

Social implications

Defining and measuring subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism is important to society given the potential adverse consequences of these perceptions. Because paternalistic relationships pervade many supervisor-subordinate interactions, both subordinates and supervisors can become more sensitive to the consequences of such interactions by understanding the conditions under which supervisor paternalism manifests itself.

Originality/value

Conceptually, in this study, the authors build on prior research and define supervisor paternalism from a social dominance perspective. Empirically, the authors contribute a statistically valid and reliable unidimensional measure.

Keywords

Citation

Wagstaff, M.F., Collela, A., Triana, M.d.C., Smith, A.N. and Watkins, M.B. (2015), "Subordinates’ perceptions of supervisor paternalism: a scale development", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 659-674. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0287

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles