To read this content please select one of the options below:

On the transposability of change management research results: a systematic scoping review of studies published in JOCM and JCM

Martin Lauzier (Department of Industrial Relations, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada and Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada)
Nathalie Lemieux (École des sciences de la gestion, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada)
Véra-Line Montreuil (Department of Industrial Relations, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada and Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada)
Caroline Nicolas (Department of Industrial Relations, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Canada and Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada)

Journal of Organizational Change Management

ISSN: 0953-4814

Article publication date: 1 July 2020

Issue publication date: 21 November 2020

642

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the transposability of study results published in the Journal of Organizational Change Management (JOCM) and the Journal of Change Management (JCM) between 2000 and 2019 for change-management practitioners and researchers.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic scoping review of a large sample of articles published in both journals was undertaken: 122 studies were considered for analysis and coded by two independent coders using an inductive grid.

Findings

Findings show that few studies (1) describe the nature of changes undertaken by organizations; (2) explain the contextual elements that characterize the environment at the moment when these same transformations are deployed; or (3) nuance their observations according to the change operation.

Research limitations/implications

Information on the type of change undertaken by the organization and about how change has been implemented is useful when communicating new scientific knowledge to practitioners. Nevertheless, the way in which studies are sometimes described masks some important nuances to be considered when interpreting or replicating certain results.

Practical implications

The relevance of these issues is enhanced by the fact that researchers or practitioners (as knowledge users) are likely to reproduce some of the actions carried out in previous studies in order to deepen research avenues or to facilitate the implementation of change initiatives in workplaces.

Originality/value

This research is among the first to assess the transferability of change-management study results published in both journals over such a long period. Its relevance also speaks to the importance of contextualizing results to ease their transposability by researchers and practitioners.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Citation

Lauzier, M., Lemieux, N., Montreuil, V.-L. and Nicolas, C. (2020), "On the transposability of change management research results: a systematic scoping review of studies published in JOCM and JCM", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 859-881. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2018-0366

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles