What matters in cost of debt: audit partner public-client specialization or busyness?

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine whether audit partner public-client specialization and busyness impact the cost of debt.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper uses data from companies in Thailand for the 1998–2016 period. To measure the cost of debt, this study uses the realized interest cost, measured as the total interest expense for the one year ahead divided by the average value of total debt outstanding during that year.

Findings

The results show a positive association between the cost of debt and two measures of public-client specialization and busyness, which are the number of public clients audited by an individual audit partner in each year and the proportion of the number of public clients divided by the number of total clients in an individual audit partner’s portfolio.

Originality/value

In the literature, there is a lack of research on whether a higher number of public clients in an audit partner’s portfolio leads to better or worse perceived audit quality. This study extends prior literature by examining whether creditors’ perception of audit quality depends on the audit partner specialization or busyness and specifically, on the number of public clients of the auditor. The findings indicate that public-client busyness of a particular audit partner, rather than the audit partner public-client specialization, matters in the cost of debt.

Citation

Sanoran, K.(L). (2020), "What matters in cost of debt: audit partner public-client specialization or busyness?", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 1379-1399. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2019-2226