To read this content please select one of the options below:

Tradeoff between well-being of students and cost of greening schools in arid regions

Basel Elkhapery (Department of Civil Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA)
Peiman Kianmehr (Department of Civil Engineering, American University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
Ryan Doczy (Department of Civil Engineering, American University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates)

Management of Environmental Quality

ISSN: 1477-7835

Article publication date: 14 February 2023

Issue publication date: 29 March 2023

107

Abstract

Purpose

Schools should be adequately built and operated to protect students' health. Green building rating systems, including Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), assist the construction industry in improving both the resource efficiency and indoor environmental quality of its buildings. Construction professionals may waive some green modifications and available optional credits due to their high costs or construction complexities. This study investigates whether cost-effective green modifications can adequately address the student health.

Design/methodology/approach

In an effort to identify how school projects in Dubai, UAE prioritized LEED credits related to occupant well-being, the study identified eight LEED credits (called “Health and wellbeing” credits). Cost data from a sample of nine Dubai schools were used to develop an indicator, named the Feasibility Index Score (FIS), to quantify the attractiveness of LEED credits based on their cost and implementation complexity. Physical measurements taken from the sample schools give a window into current indoor environmental quality (IEQ) conditions of schools in the local region, while FIS provides insight into potential financial barriers towards improving these conditions.

Findings

The authors identified eight “Health and wellbeing” credits, which may net up to 14 points or 13% of all possible LEED points. Despite this, assessments of the sample schools revealed that six of the “Health and wellbeing” credits exhibited relatively low FIS values. This may cause these credits to be waived when lower tiers of LEED certifications are desired.

Research limitations/implications

A sample of nine schools was chosen for this research; further investigation using a greater sample size is recommended.

Practical implications

The paper's IEQ assessment indicates the importance of health-related credits and suggests implementing them regardless of their FIS.

Originality/value

This paper recognizes the importance of providing more weight to credits that directly impact the health of occupants, particularly when upgrading existing structures.

Keywords

Citation

Elkhapery, B., Kianmehr, P. and Doczy, R. (2023), "Tradeoff between well-being of students and cost of greening schools in arid regions", Management of Environmental Quality, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 794-819. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2022-0249

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles