To read this content please select one of the options below:

Legitimacy-seeking strategies in the gambling industry: the case of responsible gambling

Tiffany Cheng Han Leung (School of Professional Education and Executive Development, College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 18 February 2019

Issue publication date: 8 March 2019

949

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine how responsible gambling policies are communicated and presented as a legitimation strategy to different stakeholders.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is based primarily on 49 semi-structured interviews with internal and external stakeholders of Macao’s gambling industry in 2011. This study draws on Reast et al.’s (2012) legitimacy-seeking strategy framework.

Findings

The findings indicate that these organisations use construing and earning legitimacy strategies to ensure passive support and acquiescence from certain stakeholder groups, and they deploy bargaining and capturing legitimacy strategies to generate active support for this morally contested industry. As a means of attaining long-standing legitimacy in the industry, gambling operators engage symbolically rather than substantively in responsible gambling to minimise the legitimacy gap.

Research limitations/implications

The findings of the study pertain to a unique setting and might not be suitable for generalisation.

Practical implications

In the absence of stringent legal mechanisms and strong external stakeholder pressure, the 12th Five-Year Plan of the People’s Republic of China aims to transform Macao into a “World Centre of Tourism and Leisure”, and gambling companies may soon face much stronger pressures from the Chinese Government and the Macao Government.

Social/implications

Voluntary responsible gambling initiatives are liable to be used only in symbolic fashion, without offering genuine engagement or full commitment to the most vulnerable stakeholder group.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature on social and accounting literature by providing an in-depth case study of how organisations in the gambling industry use different communication strategies to shape and respond to controversial issues.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author is pleased to acknowledge the constructive comments and suggestions received from Professors Rob Gray, Lee Parker, Markus Milne, Helen Tregidga, and Drs Philip Roscoe and Samuel Mansell. Besides, the author is very grateful for the valuable feedback provided on the paper by Robin Snell, the editors, and three anonymous reviewers.

Citation

Leung, T.C.H. (2019), "Legitimacy-seeking strategies in the gambling industry: the case of responsible gambling", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 97-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2018-0121

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles