To read this content please select one of the options below:

Do sustainability reporting standards affect analysts’ forecast accuracy?

Simone Pizzi (Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia, Universita del Salento, Lecce, Italy, and)
Fabio Caputo (Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Economia, Universita del Salento, Lecce, Italy, and)
Elbano de Nuccio (Department of Management, Finance and Technology, Universita LUM Giuseppe Degennaro, Casamassima, Italy)

Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal

ISSN: 2040-8021

Article publication date: 9 January 2024

Issue publication date: 2 February 2024

714

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to contribute to the emerging debate about materiality with novel insights about the signaling effects related to the disclosure of environmental, social and governance (ESG) information using the guidelines released by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).

Design/methodology/approach

An empirical assessment using panel data analysis was built to evaluate the relationship between sustainability reporting standards and analysts’ forecast accuracy.

Findings

The analysis revealed that the proliferation of sustainability reports prepared on mandatory or voluntary basis mitigated the signaling effects related to the disclosure of ESG information by companies. Furthermore, the additional analysis conducted considering sustainability reporting quality and ESG performance revealed the existence of mixed effects on analysts’ forecasts accuracy. Therefore, the insights highlighted the need to consider a cautionary approach in evaluating the contribution of ESG data to financial evaluations.

Practical implications

The practical implications consist of identifying criticisms related to disclosing ESG information by listed companies. In detail, the analysis underlines the need to enhance reporting standards’ interoperability to support the development of more accurate analysis by investors and financial experts.

Social implications

The analysis reveals increasing attention investors pay to socially responsible initiatives, confirming that financial markets consider sustainability reporting as a strategic driver to engage with stakeholders and investors.

Originality/value

This research represents one of the first attempts to explore differences between GRI and SASB using an empirical approach.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Editor in Chief Carol Adams for her invaluable suggestions and guidance during the development of this article. Her expertise and insights have greatly enriched the content and improved its quality.

Citation

Pizzi, S., Caputo, F. and de Nuccio, E. (2024), "Do sustainability reporting standards affect analysts’ forecast accuracy?", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 330-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2023-0227

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles