To read this content please select one of the options below:

The case against the DipHE

Laurie Sapper (General Secretary of the Association of University Teachers)

Education + Training

ISSN: 0040-0912

Article publication date: 1 May 1975

10

Abstract

The AUT is not opposed to two‐year qualifications as such. It appreciates that in appropriate ways they serve a useful function in further and higher education institutions outside the universities. However, it does not regard the proposed Diploma in Higher Education as at all the equivalent of a degree or a proper substitute for a degree education. The AUT therefore opposes its introduction to the universities and, equally, rejects the implication that, inside or outside the universities, it is a suitable alternative for a proportion of those future school‐leavers who might otherwise be given the opportunity to study for a degree.

Citation

Sapper, L. (1975), "The case against the DipHE", Education + Training, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 131-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb016375

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1975, MCB UP Limited

Related articles