To read this content please select one of the options below:

GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED V PHILIP LYONS

HOBHOUSE STUART‐SMITH (COURT OF APPEAL)
PILL LJJ (COURT OF APPEAL)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 April 1995

69

Abstract

On 6th February, 1987, Goldman Sachs (the plaintiffs in the action from which this appeal arose and the respondents to the appeal hereinafter referred to as the Plaintiffs) purchased US$10m face value worth of Exxon bonds for which they paid US$2.26m. They sold them on and a month later it transpired that the bonds were forgeries. The London brokers from whom the Plaintiffs bought the bonds revealed, following police enquiries, that they acted on the instructions of a Mr Philip Lyons (the Defendant). Mr Lyons was a Chartered Accountant, and had delivered the bonds to the clearing house when the sale was concluded and he also controlled the Liechtenstein Anstalt (a form of nominee trust) to which the purchase price had been paid. In April 1987 Mr Lyons was arrested and charged with forgery and deception.

Citation

STUART‐SMITH, H. and LJJ, P. (1995), "GOLDMAN SACHS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED V PHILIP LYONS", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024861

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1995, MCB UP Limited

Related articles