Tracing the parallel evolution of public affairs and public relations: An examination of practice, scholarship and teaching

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of two separate fields, which are essentially concerned with the same issues but are framed by different academic and professional disciplines and practice. It appears that public affairs management researchers often fail to take into account parallel literature from the discipline of public relations — even when purporting to offer an interdisciplinary approach. Equally, the public relations literature frequently fails to speak the language of business management and narrowly defines such key business activities as marketing, policy and strategy. In this paper, the authors present evidence prescribing the differing evolution of public affairs and public relations. They compare and contrast public affairs and public relations in terms of their definitions, scholarship, survey evidence, leading writers, academic and professional associations and educational programme content. They conclude by offering several suggestions for closing the gap between the two areas.

Citation

Fleisher, C.S. and Blair, N.M. (1999), "Tracing the parallel evolution of public affairs and public relations: An examination of practice, scholarship and teaching", Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026052