Online from: 1988
Subject Area: Health Care Management/Healthcare
Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile
|Title:||Managed care's clinical and economic impact on patients with type II diabetes in France: A controlled population-based study|
|Author(s):||Laurent Boyer, (Unité d'Evaluation Médicale, CHU Grenoble, Union Régionale des Caisses d'Assurance Maladie et Agence Régionale d'Hospitalisation de la Région Provence Alpes Côte d'Azur, Grenoble, France), Patrice François, (Unité d'Evaluation Médicale, CHU Grenoble, France), Magali Fourny, (Unité d'Evaluation Médicale, CHU Grenoble, France), Céline Ohrond, (Réseau de Prise en Charge des Patients Diabétiques de Type II: Diabaix, Aix en Provence, France), Charles Chanut, (Direction Régionale du Service Médical PACA et Corse, Assurance Maladie, Securité Sociale, Marseille, France), José Labarère, (Labarère is based at Unité d'Évaluation Médicale, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France), Pascal Auquier, (Laboratoire de Santé Publique, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France)|
|Citation:||Laurent Boyer, Patrice François, Magali Fourny, Céline Ohrond, Charles Chanut, José Labarère, Pascal Auquier, (2008) "Managed care's clinical and economic impact on patients with type II diabetes in France: A controlled population-based study", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 21 Iss: 3, pp.297 - 307|
|Keywords:||Diabetes, Economics, France, Health services, Medical management, Patient care|
|Article type:||Research paper|
|DOI:||10.1108/09526860810868238 (Permanent URL)|
|Publisher:||Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Acknowledgements:||The ENTRED study was supported by the Caisse Nationale de l'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS), the Institut de Veille Sanitaire (InVS) and the French Diabetics Association (ANCRED).|
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of five type II diabetes managed care programmes (MCPs) in clinical and economic terms at the community level in which these programmes function in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region of France.
Design/methodology/approach – A prospective, controlled, before-and-after study (2001-2004) compared diabetic patients who lived in departments (localities) with (the experimental group) and without a MCP (the control group). Quality of care was estimated by the conformity of health care professionals' practices when following-up type II diabetes. Costs are compared from a health service perspective.
Findings – The study finds that of 626 patients enrolled, 529 lived in departments with an MCP and 97 patients in departments without. Type II diabetes follow-up globally improved between the two study periods (2001 and 2004), but the study did not show significant differences between the two groups, except for the proportion of creatinine and ophthalmologic examinations, which were higher for the control group. The study did not find significant differences in the increase of costs between the two groups from 2001 to 2004.
Research limitations/implications – This type of study could constitute a methodological model to assess the MCP's population impact.
Practical implications – MCPs probably did not reach a critical size in terms of patient recruitment and healthcare professional adhesion to have a significant impact at a population level.
Originality/value – The study highlights a number of points to consider for future MCPs in France.
To purchase this item please login or register.
Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian