Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: European Journal of Innovation Management

European Journal of Innovation Management

ISSN: 1460-1060

Online from: 1998

Subject Area: Enterprise and Innovation

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Icon: .

Addressing R&D investment decisions: a cross analysis of R&D project selection methods


Document Information:
Title:Addressing R&D investment decisions: a cross analysis of R&D project selection methods
Author(s):Chiara Verbano, (Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vicenza, Italy), Anna Nosella, (Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vicenza, Italy)
Citation:Chiara Verbano, Anna Nosella, (2010) "Addressing R&D investment decisions: a cross analysis of R&D project selection methods", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 13 Iss: 3, pp.355 - 379
Keywords:Decision making, Innovation, Project management, Research and development
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14601061011060166 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – A large number of methodologies for R&D project selection have been developed and reported in the literature over the last few decades, and it has become a very popular research topic since the 1960s. The aim of this paper is to classify and characterize the determining aspects behind the research and development project selection process.

Design/methodology/approach – After carefully reviewing the literature and analysing the latest contributions the paper identifies the key issues for the comparison of the existing techniques used to evaluate alternative projects and portfolios of R&D projects. In the second phase the main selection methods (including the latest project portfolio optimisation approaches) are reviewed and critically compared.

Findings – The strengths, weaknesses, limitations and practicality of the methods analysed allow managers to choose the project selection model appropriate for their specific problems. Some integrated models (hybrid approach) and the latest solutions could fill the gaps in existing selection methods.

Originality/value – Although previous literature has made valid points about this subject, for the most part it concentrates on describing the project selection methods and highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. What seems to be missing, however, is a comparison of these methods. This paper contributes to bridge this gap, offering analysis that can support decision makers in their choice of the most suitable tool useful for evaluating a range of R&D projects.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (122kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
.