Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Risk Finance, The

Journal of Risk Finance, The

ISSN: 1526-5943
Incorporates: Balance Sheet

Online from: 1999

Subject Area: Accounting and Finance

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Alternative measures to value at risk


Document Information:
Title:Alternative measures to value at risk
Author(s):Colin J. Thompson, (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia), Michael A. McCarthy, (School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)
Citation:Colin J. Thompson, Michael A. McCarthy, (2008) "Alternative measures to value at risk", Journal of Risk Finance, The, Vol. 9 Iss: 1, pp.81 - 88
Keywords:Distribution functions, Portfolio investment, Risk analysis, Risk management
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/15265940810842438 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to introduce a new method of estimating risk as an alternative to value at risk (VaR), drawing on the risk assessment literature in environmental science.

Design/methodology/approach – A commonly used and accepted measure of market risk is VaR, defined as the difference between initial portfolio value and a probabilistic lower bound B on the portfolio value at time T. To take account of situations where the portfolio value may fall below B prior to time T, an an alternative to VaR is proposed based on first passage time distributions.

Findings – It is argued that the resulting expected minimum portfolio value over the time frame T provides a clear alternative measure of market risk. Analytical expressions are obtained and numerical comparisons given when the distribution of portfolio returns is lognormal.

Research limitations/implications – Analytical results are presented for lognormal distributions for returns. Results for other models can be easily obtained from simulation.

Practical implications – The new measure of risk recognizes that investors might be sensitive to risks of decline in the value of a portfolio at any time within a given time horizon, not just at the end of the anticipated period of investment. The expected minimum portfolio value measures the largest loss that is expected at some stage over that period.

Originality/value – A new measure of risk is presented that arises from literature on risk assessment in environmental science. It is complementary to VaR for assessing risk.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (101kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..