Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Multicultural Education & Technology Journal

Multicultural Education & Technology Journal

ISSN: 1750-497X

Online from: 2007

Subject Area: Education

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

(Never) Mind the gap!: Gender equity in social studies research on technology in the twenty-first century


Document Information:
Title:(Never) Mind the gap!: Gender equity in social studies research on technology in the twenty-first century
Author(s):Margaret S. Crocco, (Teachers College, Columbia University, Morristown, New York, USA), Judith Cramer, (Teachers College, Columbia University, Morristown, New York, USA), Ellen B. Meier, (Teachers College, Columbia University, Morristown, New York, USA)
Citation:Margaret S. Crocco, Judith Cramer, Ellen B. Meier, (2008) "(Never) Mind the gap!: Gender equity in social studies research on technology in the twenty-first century", Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, Vol. 2 Iss: 1, pp.19 - 36
Keywords:Communication technologies, Curricula, Educational research, Equal opportunities, Gender
Article type:Literature review
DOI:10.1108/17504970810867133 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – Focusing on gender as an aspect of diversity, the purpose of this paper is to review social studies research on technology, and suggest a new direction, with gender redefined from a gap to be eliminated to a difference to be explored.

Design/methodology/approach – This paper is a literature review of research on gender, technology, and social studies from 1987 to 2007.

Findings – Previously, men had more access and used more types of technology than women, but a shift to web-based computing eliminates some gender gaps. Women dominate online communication. Although “male” technology culture interferes with girls' self-efficacy in schools and potential computer careers, the new Web 2.0 “participatory culture” holds promise because it relies on collaboration and networking, two well documented female strengths.

Research limitations/implications – The gap notion of gender is questionable because: technology culture has been constructed as male; and social studies education, where women greatly out number men, pays little attention to gender. Evidence suggests that girls and women use technology well when it serves their interests, which may not be the same as men's. Defining gender as difference helps researchers answer calls to integrate “21st century literacies” into future studies and put gender equity at the center of future technology policy.

Originality/value – Very little has been written about gender as a facet of multicultural social studies education in its relation to social studies.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (118kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..