Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Strategic Direction

Strategic Direction

ISSN: 0258-0543

Online from: 2002

Subject Area: Strategy

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Hot or cold: is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?


Downloads: The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 389 times since 2012

Article citation: M. Sinaceur, (2012) "Hot or cold: is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?", Strategic Direction, Vol. 28 Iss: 3, pp. -


Options

Further reading

Marked list

Bookmark & share



Article Type: Abstracts From: Strategic Direction, Volume 28, Issue 3


Sinaceur M., Van Kleef G.A., Neale M.A., Adam H. and Haag C.
Journal of Applied Psychology, September 2011, Vol. 96 Issue: 5, Start page: 1018, No of pages: 15

Is communicating anger or threats more effective in eliciting concessions in negotiation? Recent research has emphasized the effectiveness of anger communication, an emotional strategy. In this article, we argue that anger communication conveys an implied threat, and we document that issuing threats is a more effective negotiation strategy than communicating anger. In three computer-mediated negotiation experiments, participants received either angry or threatening messages from a simulated counterpart. Experiment 1 showed that perceptions of threat mediated the effect of anger (vs a control) on concessions. Experiment 2 showed that (a) threat communication elicited greater concessions than anger communication and (b) poise (being confident and in control of one’s own feelings and decisions) ascribed to the counterpart mediated the positive effect of threat compared to anger on concessions. Experiment 3 replicated this positive effect of threat over anger when recipients had an attractive alternative to a negotiated agreement. These findings qualify previous research on anger communication in negotiation. Implications for the understanding of emotion and negotiation are discussed.
Article type: Research paper
ISSN: 0021-9010
Reference: 40AS193

Keywords: Anger, Conflict, Emotion communication, Negotiating, Threat



© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..