Censorship or recklessness? Obligations and legality regarding controversial materials in libraries

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the nature of the debate in terms of a recent consultation in England on guidance for public libraries in selection of controversial materials. Also discussed is the issue of censorship in terms of how it relates to the practice of librarianship.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper provides a reflective and critical overview.

Findings

The laws that limit thought are potentially dangerous and to criminalise ideas is a notion that is anti‐democratic. Librarians must always be wary of censorship from the state and any self‐censorship they feel obliged to undertake through fear of unclear laws.

Practical implications

The paper discusses a pertinent topic in current library practice and should be of interest to practitioners who are debating the issues on the front line.

Originality/value

The paper concentrates on a current issue of practice in the UK, and also wider issues facing professional librarians throughout the world.

Citation

McMenemy, D. (2009), "Censorship or recklessness? Obligations and legality regarding controversial materials in libraries", Library Review, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 85-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910936899