Labour market inactivity due to family care in Luxembourg

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to deal with an issue of female labour inactivity in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, more specifically women in the 16‐65 age category who are long‐term inactive in the formal labour market due to family responsibilities. This group currently represents one‐third of the female population of working age in the country.

Design/methodology/approach

The core of the analysis lies in examining the main socio‐demographic characteristics of family carers. First, the paper provides descriptive analysis of socio‐demographic background of women who are inactive in the labour market. Second it examines the influence of selected socio‐demographic characteristics on the woman's choice not to participate in the labour market due to family care. In the conclusions, based on the outcomes of the conducted analysis and information on the existing welfare setting in the country, the paper suggests policies which should facilitate greater participation of these women in the labour market.

Findings

Referring to the presented theory and to the findings, it can be concluded that Luxembourg is a country with a conservative orientation where women, especially those with lower education, who are married, multiple‐mothers, older than 35 years, Luxembourg nationals, and who are living in households receiving higher social benefits, choose to withdraw from the labour market due to family responsibilities.

Originality/value

Given the lack of more detailed information concerning labour market inactivity of Luxembourgish women and their labour market potential, the fact that the female labour inactivity in the country has never been examined in light of the theory of welfare states’ regimes, and the pressing Lisbon employment strategy targets, this paper represents the first in depth empirical attempt to describe and explain the phenomenon of female labour market inactivity in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and provides evidence based policy suggestions which could promote women's labour market participation. The outcomes of the cross‐sectional approach applied in this paper could serve as a base for further more sophisticated analyses of the issue of female inactivity due to family care in Luxembourg. It would be particularly interesting to focus on longitudinal analysis of transistions in and out labour market inactivity and analyze the main socio‐demographic determinants of these transitions.

Citation

Valentova, M. (2006), "Labour market inactivity due to family care in Luxembourg", Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150610706717