2001: A Research Odyssey: Teaching Different Types of Learning

Abstract

Proposes a framework for gaining a greater understanding of all types of managerial learning, which builds on Bateson′s notion of levels of learning, which provides an ideal context in which to position the range of views expressed by the management tutors. Reveals that their assumptions and beliefs about learning and teaching tend to be guided by the essential nature of their respective subject discipline, which revolves around the notion of “hard” and “soft” disciplines and, hence, provides a rationale for teaching different types of learning and affects course content and design. Analyses the differences of approach by dissecting the learning process into a series of phases which are part of a cyclical model. Reveals large variations in the degree of importance placed on pre‐ and post‐course activity. Explores this model in greater depth by discussing a particular Ashridge general management programme, which uses this framework extensively to guide its development. Concludes by suggesting that management educators should refrain from deluding both themselves and their clients that all tutors, from a variety of subject disciplines, share the same basic assumptions about learning. In fact, it is imperative that they do not share the same basic assumptions, if they are really serious about tailoring learning to individual client needs.

Citation

Wills, S. (1994), "2001: A Research Odyssey: Teaching Different Types of Learning", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410050192