To read this content please select one of the options below:

Socioemotional wealth in the family farm

Jonathan B Dressler (Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States)
Loren Tauer (Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States)

Agricultural Finance Review

ISSN: 0002-1466

Article publication date: 7 September 2015

536

Abstract

Purpose

A family member may work for the family business even though the direct financial benefits he or she may receive in the form of a salary may be lower than what could be earned working for a non-family business. The lower amount may be accepted because of benefits of association with the family business. This psychic non-pecuniary return has been called socioemotional wealth in the family business research literature. The purpose of this paper is to propose a method to estimate socioemotional wealth and apply that technique to a group of family dairy farms to estimate socioemotional wealth for those family farms.

Design/methodology/approach

A panel regression method was used to empirically allocate net farm income to the unpaid factors of equity, labor, and management provided by a family member in a family farm partnership. The estimated returns of labor plus management are compared to the market salary earned by farm managers who manage farms. The difference between the higher hired farm manager salary and what the family manager earns in the family farm from labor and management is an estimate of the non-pecuniary return the family member receives from managing the family farm as compared to managing the non-family farm.

Findings

Differences in managers’ salary working for the non-family farm and the implied family manager financial compensation estimates indicate that family business managers’ non-pecuniary return from managing the family farm had an implied economic value averaging $22,026 per year over 1999-2008. Assuming that the manager would be indifferent between working for the family farm or the non-family farm if the sum of pecuniary and non-pecuniary returns were the same, the non-pecuniary annual benefits of $22,026 accrues in the form of socioemotional wealth associated as a member in the family business.

Originality/value

Although the literature discusses how family members may accept a lower salary working for the family business than they could earn doing comparable work in a non-family business because of non-financial rewards they experience working for the family business, there have been no estimates of the value of this pecuniary benefit. The authors arrive at an estimate using a group of family dairy farm businesses that have multiple family managers.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

JEL Classification —C23, D22, J24, J43, M10, M20, M50

Citation

Dressler, J.B. and Tauer, L. (2015), "Socioemotional wealth in the family farm", Agricultural Finance Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 403-415. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-12-2014-0039

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles