Innovation adoption in inter-organizational healthcare networks – the role of artificial intelligence

Chiara Cannavale (Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy)
Anna Esempio Tammaro (Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy)
Daniele Leone (Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy)
Francesco Schiavone (Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy) (Department of Strategy and Management, Paris School of Business, Paris, France) (Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji)

European Journal of Innovation Management

ISSN: 1460-1060

Article publication date: 5 April 2022

Issue publication date: 19 December 2022

3676

Abstract

Purpose

This paper explores innovation adoption in inter-organizational healthcare networks. The authors develop theoretical speculations to investigate better the role of artificial intelligence (AI) as an innovative tool to improve buyer-supplier relationships, creating better performance outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach

The research is based on a theoretical investigation aiming at exploring the role of AI-based solutions for managing buyer-supplier relationships. The conceptual approach allows us to identify some research streams (e.g. co-working collaborations in supply chain management) by proposing a matrix that helps clarify the analysis's directions.

Findings

The results show the importance of AI that can help the operator in accessing supplier information, including current prices, available stocks, and delivery status, thereby reducing the risk of information asymmetry. AI is intended not only as a technology tool but also as an innovative solution to promote business relationships and support vertical alliances through the value chain between buyer and supplier.

Originality/value

This paper can help healthcare actors examine the choices behind their operational strategies by providing transparency of the activities and availability of information in real-time. Finally, our study reflects the future directions to enhance the cooperation and innovation adoption among healthcare operators.

Keywords

Citation

Cannavale, C., Esempio Tammaro, A., Leone, D. and Schiavone, F. (2022), "Innovation adoption in inter-organizational healthcare networks – the role of artificial intelligence", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 758-774. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-08-2021-0378

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Chiara Cannavale, Anna Esempio Tammaro, Daniele Leone and Francesco Schiavone

License

Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

The shock caused by the COVID-19 pandemic continues to propagate globally posing a worldwide public health emergency. The healthcare scenery is shifting, and the entire ecosystem is faced with enormous challenges regarding the innovations adoptions to manage the vast array of data available and the competence to extract the important set of information that will truly support intelligent decision-making. For instance, to optimize processes as inventory availability, most healthcare organizations are approaching the use of vendor-managed inventory (VMI) to make the best in a system dynamic perspective (Tyan and Wee, 2003; Angulo et al., 2004; Klein, 2012). This business model represents a cooperative strategy at the most efficient cost to reduce the bullwhip effect in a buyer-supplier collaboration within inter-organizational networks. For these reasons, the human element, including behaviors and skills, is considered as a key factor to implement the strategic alliance and make it work (McHugh and Brotherton, 2000; Adams, 2001; Kumar et al., 2012). The adoption of VMI is surely one of the most striking examples of what we are analyzing (Klein, 2012).

In this vein, vertical alliances are important tools from which companies can benefit, but stability is a fundamental element for this to happen. Buyers maintain friendly relationships with suppliers; they constantly measure the satisfaction level of their suppliers. Effectively, an unsatisfied actor (seller or buyer or both) will attempt to move to a more satisfactory practice and this may influence the stability of the collaboration (McHugh et al., 2003). Best buyers' practice-knowing suppliers' business more than suppliers' own employees. The skill is to implement efficient co-working collaborations in order to develop competitive advantages. McHugh et al. (2003) argued that powerful buyers can seriously damage organizational health. The authors provide evidence that it is fundamental to promote communication structures that motivate dialogue, consultation, and employee participation in decision-making.

On the other hand, the changes in innovation adoption have encouraged reflection on the transformation of the industry, its characteristics, and dynamics. These innovative practices in the health context are a significant opportunity to face several industry issues and create value (Christensen et al., 2009). This statement is based on the need to make the sector more efficient, gaining improved operational flexibility to face better the unprecedented disruption caused by the COVID-19 emergency (Yu et al., 2020). Thus, the coronavirus pandemic requires excellent effort from the healthcare sector, which has to deal with considerable uncertainties in supply and demand. The risk usually does not affect only one organization, but it has a broader impact (Ahlqvist et al., 2020). For these reasons, the importance of inter-organizational cooperation through the support of innovative tools (e.g. artificial intelligence) is becoming more and more relevant, especially for the existence of uncertainty in maintenance services and performance-based services (Kreye, 2019). Among other things, specific forms of interaction include increased investments in the healthcare context and effective co-modality (e.g. vertical alliances) in creating international innovation networks (McHugh et al., 2003; Biemans, 2018). Previous research has not been focused on exploring non-care directed IT solutions in the healthcare industry. Nowadays, ICTs adoption provides knowledge-sharing benefits to increase and support vertical channel strategies among buyers and suppliers involved in complex systems (Roberts, 2000; Landaeta Olivo et al., 2016; Lenka et al., 2017).

This study focuses the attention on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for improving the buyer-supplier relationships in traditional practices of e-healthcare programs emphasizing the patient and the personalization of his care (Meskò et al., 2018; Wehde, 2019; Leone et al., 2021) and helping the development of the industrial revolution (Makridakis, 2017). Indeed, the research question is: “how AI-based solutions within the healthcare sector may contribute to the buyer-supplier relationships?”. To reach this goal, we followed different steps. First, we structured a theoretical background about innovation generation and adoption. After we developed theoretical speculations (King and Walsh, 1993) focusing on the role of AI as IT-based services that improve the numerous forms mentioned above of cooperation in the healthcare sectors. Indeed, the results show how AI-based solutions are fundamental to improving buyer-supplier relationships in the healthcare sector. Our study stresses the importance of this technology that can help the operator in accessing supplier information, including current prices, available stocks, and delivery status, thereby reducing the risk of information asymmetry. Research about these topics has evolved through different research perspectives, including the use of AI not only as just technology tools but also as an innovative solution that can promote business relationships and support vertical alliances through the value chain between buyer and supplier.

The following sections are organized as follows: after illustrating the theoretical background (Section 2), we developed theoretical speculations (Section 3) by exploring AI-based solutions to support the strategic alliances among different actors involved in the inter-organizational healthcare networks. Section 4 reports the discussion of our study and proposed a conceptual model for future studies. In the last sections of the paper, the implications for future research (Section 5) and the main conclusions (Section 6) are described.

2. Theoretical background

Healthcare industry innovation has long been recognized. Despite significant advances in medical services and technologies, the sector continues to provide opportunities for innovation and new product development (Herzlinger, 2006; Leone et al., 2021; Schiavone et al., 2021). These opportunities, differently from other industries, were not always recognized due to the lack of interactions among the users/actors in the healthcare system.

Before deep in the analysis of the importance of inter-organizational networks in the innovation process, a focus on what is innovation is needed. Schumpeter (1934) suggests the existence of five types of innovation: introduction of a new good, opening a new market, acquiring a new source of supply, introducing a new method of production, and the organization of an industry, while other studies (Evangelista and Sirilli, 1995; Cooper et al., 1994) define innovation if the service or product is new to the company. Part of the literature argues that innovation is divided into two parts: innovativeness and capacity to innovate (Rogers, 1995; Tamayo-Torres et al., 2010) while Lynn and Gelb (1997) argues that innovation is the “tendency of an individual consumer to adopt new products before large numbers of others do”.

If we consider the role and objectives of the healthcare actors, we could agree that innovation in healthcare could be defined as Thakur et al. (2012) attested as “those changes that help healthcare practitioners focus on the patient by helping healthcare professionals work smarter, faster, better and more cost-effectively”.

In conclusion, many authors tried to explain what is innovation in healthcare and their definitions were moving into a range going from something very broad to the most specific technical innovations (Suanj, 2000), moving from the adoption phase and focusing on the actors that are included in it.

Based on this first introduction, our theoretical background will proceed with a focus on the generation and adoption process of innovation while including the context of the inter-organizational networks.

2.1 Generating and adopting innovation in inter-organizational networks

Innovation is considered as a process divided into different phases, i.e. generation, implementation, and adoption, including multiple interactions created by different actors (Doloreux, 2004; Omachonu and Einspruch, 2010).

Starting from the generation process, it includes ideas and creativity to give birth to an idea and the initial pilot test of the innovation. The implementation is the moment that states the transaction from the idea to the action, including the new in the routine and facing the challenges in order to implement and improve the initial idea. This is particularly important for the adoption in what is including the spread of the innovation not only internally but to the whole healthcare system, spreading it across organizations (Rogers, 1995; Plsek, 2003).

In the past, innovation generation was mostly related to the ideas within a firm, not considering the outside environment or customer/patients. Nowadays, it is not a surprise that many ideas are generated directly from the users, who are better aware of the weaknesses or the gaps to be filled to improve the service/product (Schiavone, 2020; Escobar et al., 2021).

It should be noted that an invention's success mostly requires access to assets that are complementary to creative assets (Teece, 1986). For this reason, inter-organizational and cross-sectoral networks started to be considered as a critical strategy (Dewick and Miozzo, 2004) to achieve economies of scale or merge and integrate diverse skills, technologies, and competencies (Mancinelli and Mazzanti, 2009; Kaminski et al., 2008) and speed up innovation widening the access to expertise and resources. In particular, there has been tremendous growth in the use of external networks by firms of all sizes (Hagedoorn, 2002) to adopt new technologies by innovation managers (Kalantari, 2017; Huesig and Endres, 2018). Networking with external actors (suppliers, customers, and other partners) dramatically affects the degree of innovation novelty (Nieto and Santamaria, 2010) and are fundamental in all the phases of innovation creation but it affects deeply the creation/generation processes (Bullinger et al., 2004), and more generally, on innovation achievement (Becker and Dietz, 2004) and adoption.

Inter-firms networking can have different forms (Hadjimanolis, 1999; Kaufmann and Todtling, 2002; Doloreux, 2004), and the inter-organizational linkages of this collaboration could be vertical, horizontal, or lateral (Hadjimanolis, 1999). Different types of partners have other effects and results on the innovation process (Tether, 2002). For example, some studies suggest that cooperation forms with ones located downstream and upstream in the value chain are conducive to embodied innovation spillover through commercial trading and the value-adding process (Rao, 2001).

Organizational learning plays a fundamental role in generating innovation and even more when different players interact, promoting knowledge sharing (Fang and Zou, 2010; Roberts et al., 2012). Some exciting research underlines the value of the well-known concept of absorptive learning capability (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990) and the joint learning capability, two different types of learning capacity, in enhancing the creation of Innovation (Clauß, 2012; Choi et al., 2019).

In the healthcare industry, characterized by complexity and uncertainty, partners need to create a shared vision to take advantage of opportunities for change, encouraging innovative practices while managing risk (MacLeod et al., 2019). It is exciting to reflect on the different actors of the buyer-supplier relationship in generating and adopting the innovation. Nowadays, innovating in products, organizations, and supply chains is the key to success and holding a competitive advantage for firms. Vertical cooperation is a way to create value and achieve impossible goals in isolation and obtain resources. This meaning has a more excellent value in this specific industry, contributing to HC organizational performance and customer satisfaction (Justino et al., 2019).

2.2 Interorganizational networks and buyer-supplier relationships in the healthcare context

Following the conceptual analysis, it is evident that the primary literature about inter-organizational and cross-sectoral networks is related to supply chain management (SCM). The reason is associated with the fact that vertical interfirm networks are often analyzed by many authors using an SCM background. The aim is to improve the understanding of multiple and different elements, such as the strategic role of an alternative organizational form other from vertical integration to reduce costs and the relationship that a company develops with its suppliers (McHugh et al., 2003) and the way to evaluate and improve it (Knight et al., 2017). This stream of literature has emphasized the need to improve supply chain practices to achieve the best results to the large number of benefits resulting from vertical channel strategies (Grundischi et al., 2014; Salema and Buvik, 2016; Kros et al., 2019). For instance, the need to balance efficiency and effectiveness, especially in inventory management and implementation and adoption of new operational initiatives, pushed the healthcare managers to install industrial dispensers (IVMs Industrial Vending Machines), commonly known as automatic drug dispensing systems (Kros et al., 2019). This technology replies to the need to improve supply chain management operationally and because it has a positive influence on healthcare operator performance. First, the machines provide healthcare operators with immediate access to standard and critical healthcare supplies, combining them with inventory control and monitoring. These latter are crucial in the healthcare industry for multiple reasons: technology and regulation in this area are rapidly changing, creating obstacles to developing inventory forecasts. In addition, healthcare is characterized by the uncertainty that derives from the different mix of patients and emergencies that cannot be known in advance.

Many scholars tried to focus on the impact that buyers and suppliers have on innovative processes. Azadegan and Dooley (2010) argue that suppliers are becoming more responsible in supporting innovative practices, both at a product and process level. On the other hand, buyers propel suppliers' creative attitudes, encouraging them to adopt innovation (Henke and Zhang, 2010). This effort positively influences information sharing and communication among the partners in the Supply Chain (Kim and Chai, 2017). If we look closer at the healthcare sector, cooperation between buyer and supplier is a positive factor. Indeed, some studies find that “continuous improvements in innovation with the cooperation of supplier could result in the implementation of SC management successfully” (Fongtanakit et al., 2019). This topic has become even more crucial because of the pandemic.

For this reason, managers should face the trade-off between standard routines and critical inventory, which can affect service levels and endanger patient care improving an efficient purchasing system (Salema and Buvik, 2016). Knight et al. (2017) argued that strategic relationships could eliminate the number of repetitive purchases made by an organization, identifying logistical processes external to the purchasing process that translates into savings. At the same time, these vertical channels involve a significant amount of information that could be better managed using new technologies whose importance is based on this awareness, as we argued in this paper. Indeed, Kros et al. (2019) also affirmed that future scholars should explore how healthcare operators work in innovative ways with suppliers to address new topics in healthcare supply chain management. On the other hand, limited commitment to cooperation will lead to a less effective performance by suppliers. This is even more common when VAs are international, including partners from different countries. Indeed, Dani et al. (2005) explored electronic reverse auctions (E-RA's), a coveted supply contract where suppliers from across the world can participate. This type of global outsourcing has gained immense popularity in the purchasing community, especially for buyers under pressure from their companies to reduce supplier prices.

Furthermore, we identified four research directions depending on the stability or instability of collaboration and the presence or absence of IT tools and techniques for the adoption of innovation (see Figure 1).

For example, co-working collaboration between both actors is also necessary to maintain satisfaction and stability. For these reasons, immediate action needs to be taken when either side detects a problem because the ability of supply personnel to implement effective strategic alliances is fundamental to get the most out of its supplier force (McHugh et al., 2003). Following this research direction, Ivan Su et al. (2011) attested the importance of the logistics innovation process model may include not just customers but also suppliers and may serve as an alternative to outsourcing. On the other hand, recent scholars analyzed the instability of collaboration by investigating the factors in the buyer-supplier relationship which influence the perception of seller's opportunism when the latter engages in unclear selling acts (Crosno et al., 2020). This may lead to delay in delivery times by creating uncertainty of the healthcare routines in the vertical channel strategy and negatively influencing the parties' perceptions involved in the cooperation.

3. Theoretical speculations about the role of artificial intelligence

Healthcare sectors show the influence of e-marketplaces on dyadic buyer-supplier relationships (White and Daniel, 2004). As for the consequences that this technology creates and the impact on performance, as previously mentioned, the IVM solves the higher costs that typically characterize hospitals that maintain higher inventory levels than other industries, creating inefficiencies without improving patient care. Companies can also offer a solid social and economic service and build innovative solutions between customer and supplier firms to increase value, lower total costs and achieve mutual benefits with trust and commitment (Kros et al., 2019). Drawing on the research model attested by Klein (2012), who deepen the analysis of internet-based purchasing applications for facilitating buyer-supplier relationships, we focus on the antecedents of IT infrastructure and operational performance outcomes. More specifically, we explored particularities and features of the role of AI that are worth being studied concerning inter-organizational relations in the healthcare sector. As described in the theoretical background, some research directions focus on the impact of AI on the world of work from an operational, strategic, and economic point of view, while others look at the application of these technologies and their consequences in buyer-supplier relationships. Some scholars have chosen to deepen only one of these lenses, while others have made the effort to use both in such a way as to understand the extent of the use of AI not only at the level of technology and services, but also to understand how this has gone to redesign the workplace and to create vertical alliances within the healthcare system.

In order to design a well-structured analysis, it is necessary to develop theoretical speculations about the role of AI in inter-organizational healthcare networks. This primary step is crucial, in our opinion, to develop an understanding of how AI and AI-based services are to be considered factors with an essential role for the vertical channel strategies in the healthcare industry. There are many AI tools and techniques that assist either actor in moving to efficient positions. These innovative instruments can relatively less purchase time and effort required to establish price, reducing owner skill level of procurement personnel required (Dani et al., 2005). A risk could be that the supplier is not motivated to invest time for long-term relationships and energy to develop the buyer's products. Referring to the stability of the collaboration in inter-organizational healthcare networks and the presence of IT tools, Klein's work (2012) argued that IT infrastructure is an innovative instrument for supporting the business practices' daily operations. These tools can improve operational performance derived from several variables such as the delivery times, the reduction of transaction costs, and the improvements in purchasing contracts. The author argued that the organization's ability to access information promptly is a strategic initiative to solve problems in the supply chain of existing users, such as understaffed customer service.

As Klein (2012) showed, the IT infrastructure is a relevant resource that affects systems assimilation. Drawing on these assumptions, AI is the solution to improve operational performance in hospitals through a direct and fast buyer-supplier relationship. As Cockburn et al. (2018) argued, “Artificial intelligence may greatly increase the efficiency of the existing economy. But it may have an even larger impact by serving as a new general-purpose ‘method of invention’ that can reshape the nature of the innovation process and the organization of R&D”. The implementation of collaborative SCM practices by healthcare actors can support inventory challenges. The sharing of key success factors such as information, technology, and experience, can help the organization through improved quality management (Klein, 2012; Stefani et al., 2019; Kros et al., 2019). AI could be the best innovative solution to create value for different actors (e.g. buyer, supplier, patients, physicians) (Lehoux et al., 2014; Huang and Rust, 2018; Leone et al., 2021).

AI elaborates documents in a digital format, which can be accessed by computer means at any time, and it's playing a fundamental role to improve buyer-supplier relationships in a value co-creation perspective. Specifically, the use of AI technologies could improve clinical and financial outcomes for many of our partners of health system helping the overall patient experience for those who are served by the systems we interact with (e.g. buyer and supplier) (Makridakis, 2017; Meskò et al., 2018; Chen and Decary, 2019). For these reasons, AI support several types of strategic alliances (Min, 2010; Song et al., 2010; Quan et al., 2018; Montes and Goertzel, 2019) with actors involved in B2B service systems to improve their operations and co-create value. On the other hand, value creation depends on the complete understanding of patients' present and future necessities and meeting the needs better than competitors. Indeed, these machines can also impact the well-being of older people (Hill et al., 2015).

Therefore, we can argue that AI is of crucial importance as it is an innovative driver able to implement the operational performance of companies involved in vertical alliances and address the challenges that the dynamic and international context poses to entrepreneurs. This aspect is even more true since the healthcare sector is an area in which numerous and different innovations can emerge.

4. Discussion

Many research papers deepen the analysis of the evolution in buyer-supplier relationships in inter-organizational healthcare networks (McHugh et al., 2003; Klein, 2012; Kros et al., 2019). Technological changes influence the vertical channel strategy and improve operational performance (Klein, 2012; Carr, 2015). Therefore, IT solutions are key factors of business process management since furnish inputs to each step of the process lifecycle. This study attempts to revise management literature by deepening the innovation studies regarding the role of AI-based solutions in buyer-supplier relationships in healthcare.

The conceptual analysis attested that a solid field of literature is related to the adoption of new technologies within inter-organizational networks (Salema and Buvik, 2016; Kros et al., 2019; Makridakis, 2017; Leone et al., 2021). This evidence is shown on the topic of vertical alliances that are often investigated by many scholars using a SCM organizing framework to improve the comprehension of multiple and different perspectives, such as the strategic or operational role of an alternative alliance form to reduce costs and achieve a competitive advantage. We explored the role of AI-based solutions in this field by examining literature that attests to the SCM's improvement as an effective consequence that future buyer-supplier relationships can improve efficiency performance using the data provided by this technology. With our article, we highlight the complexity of the vertical interfirm alliances to help healthcare operators be aware of the great importance of these relations on their performance outcome, developing the right strategy to implement their competitive positions involving AI tools to manage them better. Indeed, we contribute to extending previous studies (Adams, 2001; McHugh et al., 2003; Oumlil and Williams, 2011; Klein, 2012) exploring the future use of AI systems as technology tool of collaborations in the vertical channel strategy. The analysis also explores the opportunities regarding this AI use that contains a great number of information to collect and codify in order to reduce the risk of errors and information asymmetry during the buyer-supplier cooperation (see Figure 2).

Specifically, the analysis supported by theoretical speculations for future practices attested AI helps health professionals have direct access to supplier information, including current prices and reducing delivery times. AI is a widely discussed subject today because of the technological advances that have affected the various sectors (Makridakis, 2017; Meskò et al., 2018; Tubaro and Casilli, 2019). As a matter of fact, the AI is increasingly used in service contexts, reshaping and innovating it (Casares, 2018; Huang and Rust, 2018; Leone et al., 2021). Among the many envisaged future research, we outline and contribute to this one by deriving a conceptual model to understand how AI-based solutions can support buyer-supplier relationships (Figure 2). Since healthcare is one of the industries most impacted by AI-based solutions, we focus on this service context to analyze the support of AI in the vertical channel strategy. Our conceptual approach also shows many different researchers are interested in understanding how this particular technology is overcoming the limits among digital, physical and biological areas. That AI is having a tremendous and pervasive impact on many industries is a matter of fact. It suffices to look at the deluge of academic articles, reports and white papers, news in the media, and success stories over the internet, and one can immediately grasp the magnitude of such an industrial revolution (Becerra-Fernandez and Sabherwal, 2011; Meskó et al., 2018; Huang and Rust, 2018; Leone et al., 2021). What is not clear, however, is how it is doing so, and what is the impact in the future of digital buyer-supplier relationships in service business contexts and this represents the contribution of our article in the literature about innovation adoption in inter-organizational networks. Digital transformation in the vertical channel strategy describes the deep-seated changes in purchasing (Gobbi and Hsuan, 2015) and logistic areas, especially regarding the industrial and organizational activities, processes, and competencies. This aspect is required to seize the opportunities and respond to the challenges engendered by the new digital paradigm (see Figure 2). Their impact in operational performance is multifaceted: from reducing transaction costs to the improvements in purchasing contracts through reliability and the traceability of the supplier. AI infrastructures allow monitoring the delivery status by showing available stocks and supplier information. For these reasons, buyer-supplier relationships can improve by using these digital solutions as enablers of value co-creation in complex service systems and providing organizations with the key critical inputs for each step of their lifecycle.

5. Implications for future research

Drawing on the above-reported results and conceptual model, some implications for future research can be advanced. Healthcare is one of the main business contexts in which many organizations worldwide started to adopt and use such smart IT solutions in order to improve their diagnostics, processes, and operations. The healthcare industry constitutes a rather unique range of adjacent business networks (e.g. pharmaceutics, patients care, medical equipment) whose main actors could regularly interact through long-term buyer-supplier relationships. As affirmed by Leone et al. (2020), there have been changes in the market access process to combat the COVID-19 emergency in order to maintain the efficacy of the medicines made available for COVID-19 patients. Indeed, the authors showed the application of a digitalized process during this pandemic which reduced bureaucracy by overcoming the hierarchical structure of the market access in order to have a more flexible collaboration among the national agency and the local hospitals. These are proofs of the close relation between healthcare performance and the use of IT solutions to support buyer-supplier relationships to sustain the health level of society and its economic development (McHugh et al., 2003; White and Daniel, 2004; Klein, 2012). Hence, the choice to start our analysis from Klein's paper (2012) who underlined the importance of IT from an operational point of view, considering the consequences on this buyer-supplier relation.

Part of the literature of our analysis focused on the various strategic alliance orientations, dynamics, and effects in the corporate buying sector of healthcare institutions (White and Daniel, 2004; Oumlil and Williams, 2011). Healthcare has been rarely investigated from the industrial and innovation perspective, emphasizing how the relations between buyer and supplier are developed and implemented. This study offer implication for scholars involved in innovation and management studies by presenting a conceptual framework that shows the adoption of AI-based solutions to improve buyer-supplier relationships within the inter-organizational networks in the healthcare context. Actors involved in these relationships need to face the rapid technological change and the uncertainty that characterize the healthcare sector. Thus, a close collaboration among the actors of the vertical channel could be essential for the successful development and the future adoption of the right AI-based industrial services able to satisfy a specific market need or to exploit a given business opportunity. As we previously described, an important implication for healthcare practitioners could be the correct use of these smart IT solutions as tools to diminish the operational distance among actors involved in the supply chain. Hence, the great opportunity to avoid informative asymmetry causes time and performance loss. These issues are crucial for the healthcare sector which due to the unique mix of elements characterizing it – is influenced by a rapid change in technology and regulation. Healthcare operators need to face uncertainty and volatility to better manage the impossibility of creating forecasts and making plans. As some authors argued, one of the critical issues distinguishing this industry is the need to solve the trade-off between standard routines and new practices (Salema and Buvik, 2016). In addition, the reduced distance among actors can implement knowledge transfer and acquisition, supporting the creation of new technology and sustaining the use of AI-based services to generate a superior performance level and enforce the innovation propensity to create and use innovation.

6. Limitations and future research

This study is not without limitations. Firstly, theoretical speculation could be proven in the future by analyzing case studies to investigate the actual improvement in the actors' performance. Moreover, given the great importance of regulation for the healthcare sector, case analysis could highlight the variations in AI-based services for different operators who are subjected to different rules. A cross-country study or a more specific one focusing on a precise stage of the supply chain can add precious knowledge to better examine the role and importance of AI in healthcare vertical interfirm relations.

On the other hand, the analysis allowed us to add an overview of the literature production and consequent temporal change characterizing this topic. This analysis will deepen the issue by examining the literature production in these fields, understanding its growth and characteristics, to explore future practices. Thus, future research could regard the exploitation and the study of the Industry 4.0 technologies (e.g. big data, cloud computing, and so on) to explore the different types of value exchanged among buyers and suppliers. This is an important element to consider for implementing vertical alliances between these different actors involved in service sectors as healthcare. Other scholars have not in-depth analyzed the healthcare industry's usage of non-care directed IT solutions. AI machines can support the operational performance in hospitals, developing predictive models to prevent errors and facilitating inter-organizational interaction in the vertical channel strategy.

7. Conclusions

Many of the papers we collected stressed the importance of new technologies that can help the operator access supplier information, including current prices, available stocks, and delivery status, thereby reducing the risk of information asymmetry (see Figure 2).

The interaction between buyer and supplier happens for various reasons, such as the timely exchange of essential products at a competitive price (McHugh et al., 2003; Dani et al., 2005). Indeed, a positive effect is the availability of many suppliers and a stable supply market. This is even more important because individual strategic purchasing opportunities could translate into collaborative relationships to improve purchasing processes within the organization (Gobbi and Hsuan, 2015; Knight et al., 2017). AI-based solutions can face some complex problems, especially in the healthcare sector: risks and control costs are high, and there is a need for quality care. These aspects are crucial because the “risk perception influences communication, trust, and the governance of a collaboration […] and collaboration fluency affect collaboration fluency” (Grudinschi et al., 2014).

Finally, yet importantly, this study aims at implementing the knowledge about the topics of VAs in the healthcare sectors, analyzing the state-of-art of literature, and deepening the understanding in order to give a clear research framework. In our opinion, this latter can help researchers to have a clear examination of the contributions on these topics. This paper underlines not only the characteristics and dynamics of the paper contribution in the previously chosen period, but it presents also the most important streams of research that were – and still are – used in order to investigate the past, present, and future of the vertical collaborations in the selected industry. Thanks to this study, researchers can improve the analysis of the next directions that these collaborations should follow and how this latter can be implemented through the use of AI to create positive effects on the supply chain management and on firms – and more in general actors' – performance.

Figures

A matrix for research directions of buyer-supplier relationships in healthcare

Figure 1

A matrix for research directions of buyer-supplier relationships in healthcare

The future of buyer-supplier relationships adopting AI infrastructure: a conceptual model

Figure 2

The future of buyer-supplier relationships adopting AI infrastructure: a conceptual model

References

Adams, P.R. (2001), “Making strategic alliances work in the healthcare industry”, Journal of Medical Marketing, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 252-265.

Ahlqvist, V., Norrman, A. and Jahre, M. (2020), “Supply chain risk governance: towards a conceptual multi-level framework”, Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 382-395.

Angulo, A., Nachtmann, H. and Waller, M.A. (2004), “Supply chain information sharing in a vendor managed inventory partnership”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 101-120.

Azadegan, A. and Dooley, K.J. (2010), “Supplier innovativeness, organizational learning styles and manufacturer performance: an empirical assessment”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 488-505.

Becerra-Fernandez, I. and Sabherwal, R. (2011), “The role of information and communication technologies in knowledge management: a classification of knowledge management systems”, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, 2nd ed., IGI Global, pp. 1410-1418.

Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004), “R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry”, Research Policy, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 209-223.

Biemans, W. (2018), Managing Innovation within Networks, Routledge, London.

Bullinger, H.J., Auernhammer, K. and Gomeringer, A. (2004), “Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42 No. 17, pp. 3337-3353.

Carr, A.S. (2015), “Relationships among information technology, organizational cooperation and supply chain performance”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 28 Nos 3/4, pp. 171-123.

Casares, A.P. (2018), “The brain of the future and the viability of democratic governance: the role of artificial intelligence, cognitive machines, and viable systems”, Futures, Vol. 103, pp. 5-16.

Chen, M. and Decary, M. (2019), “Artificial intelligence in healthcare: an essential guide for health leaders”, Healthcare Management Forum, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA, p. 0840470419873123.

Choi, K., Jean, R.J.B. and Kim, D. (2019), “The impacts of organizational learning capacities on relationship-specific innovations: evidence from the global buyer–supplier relationship”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1042-1066.

Christensen, C.M., Grossman, J.H. and Hwang, J. (2009), The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Healthcare.

Clauß, T. (2012), “The influence of the type of relationship on the generation of innovations in buyer–supplier collaborations”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 388-411.

Cockburn, I.M., Henderson, R. and Stern, S. (2018), The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Innovation (No. W24449), National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 128-152.

Cooper, R.G., Easingwood, C.J., Edgett, S., Kleinschmidt, E.J. and Storey, C. (1994), “What distinguishes the top performing new productsinfinancial services?”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 281-299.

Crosno, J., Dahlstrom, R. and Friend, S.B. (2020), “Assessments of equivocal salesperson behavior and their influences on the quality of buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 161-179.

Dani, S., Burns, N.D. and Backhouse, C.J. (2005), “Buyer–supplier behaviour in electronic reverse auctions: a relationships perspective”, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 22-34.

Dewick, P. and Miozzo, M. (2004), “Networks and innovation: sustainable technologies in Scottish social housing”, R&D Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 323-333.

Doloreux, D. (2004), “Regional innovation systems in Canada: a comparative study”, Regional Studies, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 479-492.

Escobar, O., Schiavone, F., Khvatova, T. and Maalaoui, A. (2021), “Lead user innovation and entrepreneurship: analyzing the current state of research”, Journal of Small Business Management, pp. 1-18.

Evangelista, R. and Sirilli, G. (1995), “Measuring innovation in services”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 207-215.

Fang, E. and Zou, S. (2010), “The effects of absorptive and joint learning on the instability of international joint ventures in emerging economies”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 906-924.

Fongtanakit, R., Somjai, S., Prasitdumrong, A. and Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019), “The role of innovation in the healthcare supply chain of Thailand”, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 317-324.

Gobbi, C. and Hsuan, J. (2015), “Collaborative purchasing of complex technologies in healthcare system: implications for alignment strategies”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 430-455.

Grudinschi, D., Sintonen, S. and Hallikas, J. (2014), “Relationship risk perception and determinants of the collaboration fluency of buyer–supplier relationships in public service procurement”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 82-91.

Hadjimanolis, A. (1999), “Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus)”, Technovation, Vol. 19 No. 9, pp. 561-570.

Hagedoorn, J. (2002), “Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 477-492.

Henke, J.W. Jr and Zhang, C. (2010), “Increasing supplier-driven innovation”, IT Management Select, Vol. 16, pp. 41-46.

Herzlinger, R.E. (2006), “Innovating in health care-framework”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 9, pp. 306-342.

Hill, R., Betts, L.R. and Gardner, S.E. (2015), “Older adults' experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis) empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 48, pp. 415-423.

Huang, M.H. and Rust, R.T. (2018), “Artificial intelligence in service”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 155-172.

Huesig, S. and Endres, H. (2018), “Exploring the digital innovation process: the role of functionality for the adoption of innovation management software by innovation managers”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 22, pp. 302-314.

Ivan Su, S.I., Gammelgaard, B. and Yang, S.L. (2011), “Logistics innovation process revisited: insights from a hospital case study”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 577-600.

Justino, E., Santos, G., Marques, V. and Marques, C.S. (2019), “The impact of cooperation and I&D research on innovation in the healthcare sector”, International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Academic Conferences International, pp. 460-XXV.

Kalantari, M. (2017), “Consumers' adoption of wearable technologies: literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda”, International Journal of Technology Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 274-307.

Kaminski, P.C., de Oliveira, A.C. and Lopes, T.M. (2008), “Knowledge transfer in product development processes: a case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil”, Technovation, Vol. 28 Nos 1-2, pp. 29-36.

Kaufmann, A. and Tödtling, F. (2002), “How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria”, Technovation, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 147-159.

Kim, M. and Chai, S. (2017), “The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: global supply chain perspective”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 187, pp. 42-52.

King, G. and Walsh, D.J. (1993), “Good research and bad research: extending Zimile’s criticism”, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 397-401.

Klein, R. (2012), “Assimilation of Internet-based purchasing applications within medical practices”, Information and Management, Vol. 49 Nos 3-4, pp. 135-141.

Knight, A.K., Blessner, P., Olson, B.A. and Blackburn, T.D. (2017), “Strategic sourcing and corporate social responsibility: aligning a healthcare organization's strategic objectives”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 94-104.

Kreye, M.E. (2019), “Does a more complex service offering increase uncertainty in operations?”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management.

Kros, J.F., Kirchoff, J.F. and Falasca, M. (2019), “The impact of buyer-supplier relationship quality and information management on industrial vending machine benefits in the healthcare industry”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, p. 100506.

Kumar, D., Singh, J. and Singh, O. (2012), “A decision support system for analysis of effects of timely fulfillment of customer demand in supply chain management practices”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 61 Nos 5-8, pp. 809-826.

Landaeta Olivo, J.F., Garcia Guzman, J., Colomo-Palacios, R. and Stantchev, V. (2016), “IT innovation strategy: managing the implementation communication and its generated knowledge through the use of an ICT tool”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 512-533.

Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., Williams-Jones, B., Denis, J.L. and Longo, C. (2014), “How do business model and health technology design influence each other? Insights from a longitudinal case study of three academic spin-offs”, Research Policy, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1025-1038.

Lenka, S., Parida, V. and Wincent, J. (2017), “Digitalization capabilities as enablers of value co-creation in servitizing firms”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 92-100.

Leone, D., Panetti, E., Caporuscio, A. and Pietronudo, M.C. (2020), “Changes in the market access process to combat COVID-19. An exploratory study in Italy”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 184-196.

Leone, D., Schiavone, F., Appio, F.P. and Chiao, B. (2021), “How does Artificial Intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 129 C, pp. 849-859.

Lynn, M. and Gelb, B.D. (1997), “Identifying innovative national markets for technical consumer goods”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 43-57.

MacLeod, M.L., Hanlon, N., Reay, T., Snadden, D. and Ulrich, C. (2019), “Partnering for change: how a health authority, physicians, and communities work together to transform primary healthcare services”, Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Makridakis, S. (2017), “The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: its impact on society and firms”, Futures, Vol. 90, pp. 46-60.

Mancinelli, S. and Mazzanti, M. (2009), “Innovation, networking and complementarity: evidence on SME performances for a local economic system in North-Eastern Italy”, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 567-597.

McHugh, M. and Brotherton, C. (2000), “Strategic warning: powerful buyers can seriously damage organisational health”, International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 28-43.

McHugh, M., Humphreys, P. and Mclvor, R. (2003), “Buyer-supplier relationships and organizational health”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 15-25.

Meskó, B., Hetényi, G. and Győrffy, Z. (2018), “Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?”, BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, p. 545.

Min, H. (2010), “Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory and applications”, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 13-39.

Montes, G.A. and Goertzel, B. (2019), “Distributed, decentralized, and democratized artificial intelligence”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 141, pp. 354-358.

Nieto, M.J. and Santamaría, L. (2010), “Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 44-69.

Omachonu, V.K. and Einspruch, N.G. (2010), “Innovation in healthcare delivery systems: a conceptual framework”, The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-20.

Oumlil, A.B. and Williams, A.J. (2011), “Strategic alliances and organisational buying: an empirical study of the healthcare industry”, International Journal of Procurement Management, Vol. 4 No. 6, pp. 610-626.

Plsek, P. (2003), “Complexity and the adoption of innovation in health care”, Accelerating Quality Improvement in Health Care: Strategies to Accelerate the Diffusion of Evidence-Based Innovations, National Institute for Healthcare Management Foundation and National Committee for Quality in Health Care, Washington, DC.

Quan, H., Li, S. and Hu, J. (2018), “Product innovation design based on deep learning and Kansei engineering”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 8 No. 12, p. 2397.

Rao, B. (2001), “Broadband innovation and the customer experience imperative”, International Journal on Media Management, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 56-65.

Roberts, J. (2000), “Knowledge systems and global advertising services”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 163-170.

Roberts, N., Galluch, P.S., Dinger, M. and Grover, V. (2012), “Absorptive capacity and information systems research: review, synthesis, and directions for future research”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 625-648.

Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., The Free Press, New York.

Salema, G. and Buvik, A. (2016), “The impact of buyer-supplier integration on supplier logistics performance in the hospital sector in Tanzania: the moderation effect of buyers' cross functional integration”, International Journal of Procurement Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 166-184.

Schiavone, F. (2020), User Innovation in Healthcare: How Patients and Caregivers React Creatively to Illness, Springer Nature, NY.

Schiavone, F., Sabetta, A., Leone, D. and Chiao, B. (2021), “Industrial convergence and industrial crisis: a situational analysis about precision medicine during the covid-19 pandemic”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, pp. 1-12.

Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Song, X., Tian, H. and Wu, X. (2010), “Study on SMEs-oriented strategic decision support system based on competitive intelligence”, 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, IEEE, pp. 1-4.

Stefani, U., Schiavone, F., Laperche, B. and Burger-Helmchen, T. (2019), “New tools and practices for financing novelty: a research agenda”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 314-328.

Suanj, Z. (2000), “Innovative climate and culture in manufacturing organizations; differences between some European Countries”, Social Science Information, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 349-361.

Tamayo-Torres, I., Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L. and Haro-Dominguez, M.C. (2010), “Innovation and operative real options as ways to affect organisational learning”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 421-438.

Teece, D.J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 285-305.

Tether, B.S. (2002), “Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 947-967.

Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H. and Fontenot, G. (2012), “Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 65 No. 4, pp. 562-569.

Tubaro, P. and Casilli, A.A. (2019), “Micro-work, artificial intelligence and the automotive industry”, Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, pp. 1-13.

Tyan, J. and Wee, H.M. (2003), “Vendor managed inventory: a survey of the Taiwanese grocery industry”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 11-18.

Wehde, M.B. (2019), “Healthcare 4.0”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 24-28.

White, A. and Daniel, E.M. (2004), “The impact of e-marketplaces on dyadic buyer-supplier relationships: evidence from the healthcare sector”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 441-453.

Yu, W., Zhao, G., Liu, Q. and Song, Y. (2020), “Role of big data analytics capability in developing integrated hospital supply chains and operational flexibility: an organizational information processing theory perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 163, p. 120417.

Further reading

Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017), “bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping anal ysis”, Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 959-975.

Awan, U., Kraslawski, A. and Huiskonen, J. (2018), “Governing interfirm relationships for social sustainability: the relationship between governance mechanisms, sustainable collaboration, and cultural intelligence”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 12, p. 4473.

Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. and Drayer, R.W. (2005), “The digital transformation: technology and beyond”, Supply Chain Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 22-29.

Breidbach, C.F. and Maglio, P.P. (2016), “Technology-enabled value co-creation: an empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 56, pp. 73-85.

Calvelli, A. (1998), Scelte d’impresa e mercati internazionali: strategie, organizzazione, finanza, G. Giappichelli, Turin.

Calvelli, A. and Cannavale, C. (2018), Internationalizing Firms. International Strategy, Trends and Challenges, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Doty, D.H. and Glick, W.H. (1994), “Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 230-251.

Elton, J. and O’Riordan, A. (2016), Healthcare Disrupted: Next Generation Business Models and Strategies, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.

Grant, R.M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation”, California Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 114-135.

Gulati, R., Lawrence, P.R. and Puranam, P. (2005), “Adaptation in vertical relationships: beyond incentive conflict”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 415-440.

Hatton, M.J. and Mathews, B.P. (1996), “Relationship marketing in the NHS: will it bring the buyers and suppliers together again?”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 41-47.

Jabareen, Y. (2009), “Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 49-62.

Lee, S.M., Lee, D.H. and Schniederjans, M.J. (2011), “Supply chain innovation and organizational performance in the healthcare industry”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 1193-1214.

Matt, C., Hess, T. and Benlian, A. (2015), “Digital transformation strategies”, Business and Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 57 No. 5, pp. 339-343.

Quan, X.I. and Sanderson, J. (2018), “Understanding the artificial intelligence business ecosystem”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 22-25.

Schartinger, D., Miles, I., Saritas, O., Amanatidou, E., Giesecke, S., Heller-Schuh, B. and Schreier, G. (2015), “Personal health systems technologies: critical issues in service innovation and diffusion”, Technology Innovation Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 46-57.

Zainuddin, N., Russell-Bennett, R. and Previte, J. (2013), “The value of health and wellbeing: an empirical model of value creation in social marketing”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47 No. 9, pp. 1504-2152.

Corresponding author

Francesco Schiavone is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: francesco.schiavone@uniparthenope.it

About the authors

Chiara Cannavale is Head of Studies of BBA and MSc in Management, at the Department of Management and Quantitative Studies of the Università Parthenope (Naples), where she is also chair of Cross-Cultural management and International Management. President of the International Association of Cross-Cultural management and Competence, and member of the Editorial Board of the European Journal of Cross-Cultural management and Competence, she focuses her research on the impact of country culture on the internationalization process of firms, and on the development of entrepreneurship, with a particular focus on emerging and transition markets, and specifically on the Islamic countries of Middle East and South Mediterranean Countries. She is authors of many publication on the topics, both papers published in international journals and books in Italian and English. Member of the Academy of Management and of the Academy of International Business, she is often abroad for conferences and visiting period, mostly in France and Morocco.

Anna Esempio Tammaro is PhD in Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Department of Management and Quantitative Studies, University of Naples Parthenope (IT). She was a Visiting PGR at the University of Birmingham (UK) Business School. Her research mainly focuses on International Management, Business Strategy and Entrepreneurship with a detailed reference to Vertical Alliances and Innovation.

Daniele Leone is Research Fellow at the Parthenope University of Naples, Italy. He received his doctoral degree in management from the University of Naples Federico II in February 2019. He was Visiting Scholar at the Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK and at the EMLV Business School, Paris, FR. He is also a member of the editorial board of the International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business. His research has been published in Journal of Business Research, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal; Journal of Intellectual Capital, Business Process Management Journal, Production, Planning and Control, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. His main research areas are innovation management, digital business models, crowdfunding and healthcare management. He is also working as Guest Editor for Special Issues for Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, European Journal of Innovation Management and Journal of General Management.

Francesco Schiavone is an associate professor in management at Parthenope University of Naples, Italy since 2016. He received the Ph.D. degree in network economics and knowledge management from the Ca' Foscari University of Venice (Italy) in 2006. He is also an Affiliated Professor in innovation management at Emlyon Business School and Paris School of Business (France). In April 2017 Prof. Schiavone has been qualified as Full Professor in management by MIUR (Italian Ministry of Education and Research). Currently, his main research areas are technology management, strategic innovation, and healthcare management and innovation. Prof. Schiavone is the scientific director of VIMASS, the research lab in healthcare management and innovation, established at University Parthenope.

Related articles