To read this content please select one of the options below:

A social ecological model (SEM) to exploring barriers of and facilitators to the implementation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programmes in prisons

Rita Komalasari (Faculty of Health Science, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK, and Faculty of Medicine, Yarsi University, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia)
Sarah Wilson (Sociology in the School of Applied Social Science at the University of Stirling, UK)
Sally Haw (Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK)

International Journal of Prisoner Health

ISSN: 1744-9200

Article publication date: 7 August 2021

Issue publication date: 17 November 2021

154

Abstract

Purpose

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programmes in prisons play a significant role in preventing the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Despite its proven effectiveness, both the availability and coverage of prison OAT programmes remain low. This Indonesian study explores facilitators of, and barriers to, the delivery of methadone programmes in prisons using the social ecological model (SEM).

Design/methodology/approach

The study used a qualitative case study approach comprising two prisons with, and one prison without, methadone programmes. Purposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit study participants. In total, 57 in-depth interviews were conducted with prison governors, health-care staff, prison officers and prisoners. Data was analysed thematically.

Findings

The study findings identified facilitators of and barriers to the delivery of prison OAT programmes at all three levels of the SEM as follows: intrapersonal barriers including misperceptions relating to HIV transmission, the harm reduction role of OAT programmes, methadone dependency and withdrawal symptoms; interpersonal barriers such as inflexible OAT treatment processes and the wide availability of illicit drugs in prisons and; social-structural barriers, notably the general lack of resources.

Research limitations/implications

The findings highlight the importance of and overlap between, organisational and inter-personal, as well as intrapersonal factors. Such an approach is particularly important in the context of the implementation and delivery of methadone programmes in low/middle income countries, where the lack of resources is so significant.

Practical implications

Three main strategies for improvement were suggested as follows: the development of comprehensive education and training programmes for prisoners and all prison staff; the re-assessment of practices relating to the delivery of methadone, and a comprehensive review of harm reduction strategy in prisons, that should consider the role of prisoners’ families to increase support for prisoner participation; the re-assessment of prison policies to support the delivery of methadone programmes in prisons.

Social implications

The author suggests that ongoing international support and national drug policies are vital to the continuation and sustainability of methadone programmes in prisons.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the overall evidence base for OAT programmes in middle-income prison contexts.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the insightful comments offered by the anonymous peer reviewers. Funding: The authors received no financial support for the publication of this article.

Citation

Komalasari, R., Wilson, S. and Haw, S. (2021), "A social ecological model (SEM) to exploring barriers of and facilitators to the implementation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) programmes in prisons", International Journal of Prisoner Health, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-04-2020-0020

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles