Food security in Papua New Guinea: the need to go beyond “business case CSR”

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to canvass the views of villagers from a remote region of Papua New Guinea (PNG) on food security issues in their community and their level of satisfaction with food security initiatives provided by the extractive company that operated on their land.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative design: data gathered through 14 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and a discussion forum with 20 villagers from Pawa. Purposive sampling. Snow-balling method of recruitment.

Findings

Food security was identified as a growing concern among the villagers, who also expressed dissatisfaction with the food security projects offered through the corporate social responsibility (CSR) program offered by the company operating on their land. Communication problems between company and community and lack of trust were evident.

Research limitations/implications

Possibility of self-selection bias among participants. The perspective of the company was under-represented.

Practical implications

The study highlights the need for CSR practitioners to be mindful of the importance of effective communication with local communities.

Social Implications

The study reveals the importance of meaningful dialogue between company and host communities, which can lead to a more efficient allocation of resources and empowerment of host communities.

Originality/value

The study bridges a research gap in the field of CSR in developing countries because food security, as a CSR issue in PNG communities, is under-researched. The study contributes to a better understanding of company –community relations in PNG and how these relations can be improved through a more normative approach to CSR. It also highlights the importance of empowering host communities through meaningful dialogue.

Citation

Duarte, F.d.P. and Imbun, B.Y. (2016), "Food security in Papua New Guinea: the need to go beyond “business case CSR”", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 523-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2015-0129