To read this content please select one of the options below:

Reframing the Disclosure Debate: Confronting Issues of Transparency in Teaching Controversial Content

Jennifer H. James (Kent State University)

Social Studies Research and Practice

ISSN: 1933-5415

Article publication date: 1 March 2009

Issue publication date: 1 March 2009

71

Abstract

I contend that traditional ways of conceptualizing the “disclosure dilemma” are limited due to a lack of attention to the more subtle ways teachers’ personal experiences and understandings help shape their practices. The decision to “dis-close” personal opinions on a controversial issue is, perhaps, less important than the exploration of what those personal opinions are and the degree of influence on pedagogy regardless of the decision to make those opinions public. In this way, disclosure can be understood as simply a willingness to be transparent about positionality with regard to the content being taught. As context for this conversation, I offer discussion of my experiences as an elementary social studies teacher educator in which I strived to engage such transparency as both method and content. In the end, I offer reflections about what is difficult, yet critically important about engaging in this work.

Citation

James, J.H. (2009), "Reframing the Disclosure Debate: Confronting Issues of Transparency in Teaching Controversial Content", Social Studies Research and Practice, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-01-2009-B0007

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles