Outstanding Paper Award

Benchmarking: An International Journal

ISSN: 1463-5771

Article publication date: 24 October 2008

476

Keywords

Citation

(2008), "Outstanding Paper Award", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 15 No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij.2008.13115faa.002

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited


Outstanding Paper Award

Article Type: Awards for Excellence From: Benchmarking: An International Journal, Volume 15, Issue 6

"Impacts of information management on business performance"

James R. EvansDepartment of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management, College of Business, University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Purpose – The objective of this paper is to analyze and interpret some empirical results, obtained from an online survey, on the types of review and analysis approaches used by organizations in manufacturing, service, education, health care, and not-for-profit sectors and their relationships with business performance.Design/methodology/approach – Data were gathered using an online survey to capture basic information about the organization and its performance, the types of measures used in each of the five Baldrige results item groups, types and frequencies of review of the data, and types of analyses conducted. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistical analyses and tests for significant differences.Findings – The results suggest that a significant gap exists in the sophistication of analysis methods between higher and lower performing organizations in terms of customer, financial, and market performance, and that better performance is associated with more mature and sophisticated approaches to performance analysis.Research limitations/implications – Because of the exploratory nature of this study, the generalizibility of the conclusions is limited; however, the results of this study can be useful for developing more formal theories to understand management practices and business performance and, as a basis for more designing, research efforts validate the propositions suggested by these theories.Practical implications – Managers should invest in effective performance measurement systems that include sound approaches for analyzing results and sharing information appropriately throughout the organization.Originality/value – This work provides further validation of the quality management principle and Baldrige core value of “management by fact,” and offers practical advice for designing effective performance management systems.

Keywords: Balanced scorecard, Baldrige Award, Knowledge management, Performance measurement (quality)

www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/14635770710761906

This article originally appeared in Volume 14 Number 4, 2007, pp. 517-33, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Editor: Angappa Gunasekaran

Highly commended Papers

Benchmarking: An International Journal

"Benchmarking the performance of English Universities"

Jeff Pursglove and Mike SimpsonVol. 14 No. 1, 2007

"BSC and benchmark development for an e-commerce SME"

Robert C. RickardsVol. 14 No. 2, 2007

"An investigation of the relationships between organizational factors, business process improvement, and ERP success"

Chuck C. H. Law and Eric W. T. NgaiVol. 4 No. 3, 2007

Related articles