To read this content please select one of the options below:

Risk Cubes or Price Risk and Ratings (Part II)

MORTON N. LANE (Senior managing director in the capital markets division of Gerling Global Financial Products in New York.)
OLEG Y. MOVCHAN (Quantitative risk analyst in the asset allocation/currency division of UBS Brinson in Chicago.)

Journal of Risk Finance

ISSN: 1526-5943

Article publication date: 1 January 1999

209

Abstract

Risk is difficult to measure — so difficult that no single measure seems robust enough for all circumstances. This is especially true of measuring the risk contained in insurance‐linked securities. Insurance risk is usually asymmetrically skewed. As a conse‐quence, traditional capital market risk measures — expected loss, probability of default, and the standard deviation of return out‐comes — are less than perfect to the insurance task. Without a good risk measure, it is impossible to compare the risk‐adjusted pricing of insurance‐linked notes on a consistent basis. It is impossible to tell which securities are cheap and which are expensive. It is impossible to decide on their value relative to more traditional investments.

Citation

LANE, M.N. and MOVCHAN, O.Y. (1999), "Risk Cubes or Price Risk and Ratings (Part II)", Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022938

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles