Building a knowledge sharing climate amid shadows of sabotage: a microfoundational perspective into job satisfaction and knowledge sabotage
Abstract
Purpose
Drawing on the microfoundations theory and rational choice sociology, this study aims to investigate knowledge-sharing microfoundations through knowledge sabotage behaviours in the workplace. As such, it aims to shed light on the adverse impact of knowledge sabotage on a knowledge-sharing climate.
Design/methodology/approach
As a quantitative deductive study, it is based on information collected from 329 employees of European companies by self-administered online surveys. Data validity and reliability has been assessed through a confirmatory factor analysis, and data analysis was carried out by using a covariance-based structural equation modelling technique.
Findings
The findings from the empirical investigation supported the baseline hypotheses of the multilevel conceptual model, which is the positive relationship between organizational trust and environmental knowledge sharing. Then, recurring to a microfoundational exploration, this study supports the mediating indirect effect of job satisfaction and knowledge sabotage in affecting knowledge sharing as a social outcome.
Research limitations/implications
This study concurs to broaden knowledge-sharing awareness among scholars and practitioners, by focusing on knowledge sabotage as its most pernicious counterproductive behaviour. Furthermore, this research provides valuable guidance for the future development of research based on multilevel investigations.
Originality/value
This study builds on the need to explore the numerous factors that affect knowledge sharing in economic organizations, specifically focusing on knowledge sabotage. Adapting Coleman’s bathtub, the authors advance the first multilevel conceptual model used to unveil the knowledge-sharing microfoundations from the perspective of a counterproductive knowledge behaviour.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
According to the standardised CRediT taxonomy, the authors acknowledge each contribution to the article as follows. Francesco Antonio Perotti: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Visualization; Zoltan Rozsa: Validation, Writing – review and editing; Michal Kuděj: Validation, Writing – review and editing; Alberto Ferraris: Conceptualisation, Validation, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Project administration.
The authors extend their gratitude to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive feedback, which greatly contributed to enhancing the quality of the article during the review process.
Citation
Perotti, F.A., Rozsa, Z., Kuděj, M. and Ferraris, A. (2024), "Building a knowledge sharing climate amid shadows of sabotage: a microfoundational perspective into job satisfaction and knowledge sabotage", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2023-0262
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited